Filed: Mar. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2014
Summary: JOINT STIPULATON TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Plaintiff John M. McGraw and Defendants Western Service Contract Corp., The McGraw Company, and Pacific Specialty Insurance Company ("the McGraw companies"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is set for March 26, 2014; WHEREAS, this issues presented in this case are whether Plai
Summary: JOINT STIPULATON TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER JON S. TIGAR, District Judge. Plaintiff John M. McGraw and Defendants Western Service Contract Corp., The McGraw Company, and Pacific Specialty Insurance Company ("the McGraw companies"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is set for March 26, 2014; WHEREAS, this issues presented in this case are whether Plain..
More
JOINT STIPULATON TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge.
Plaintiff John M. McGraw and Defendants Western Service Contract Corp., The McGraw Company, and Pacific Specialty Insurance Company ("the McGraw companies"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Initial Case Management Conference in this matter is set for March 26, 2014;
WHEREAS, this issues presented in this case are whether Plaintiff is entitled to be indemnified by Defendants in McGraw v. McGraw et al., San Mateo County Superior Court Case No. CIV492464, and whether the McGraw companies must advance such fees and expenses to Mr. McGraw before a final determination on indemnification is made;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction seeking advancement, and that motion has been fully briefed;
WHEREAS, as set forth in the parties' respective papers, the parties have agreed on the essential terms of an order requiring advancement and resolving the preliminary injunction motion;
WHEREAS, the parties have further agreed, as set forth in their respective papers, that a stay of this action pending resolution of McGraw v. McGraw is warranted because issues of indemnification should be resolved after resolution of the underlying matter;
WHEREAS, given the parties' agreement on an order requiring advancement and the proposed stay of this action, a case management conference at this time is unnecessary;
WHEREAS, the Court has determined that the preliminary injunction motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court issue an Order as follows:
The Initial Case Management Conference in this matter, scheduled for March 26, 2014, at 2:00 p.m., is continued until May 21, 2014, at 2:00 p.m.
IT IS SO STIPULATED
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 26, 2014 is continued to May 21, 2014 at 2:00 p.m.
