CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
A. The United States of America ("United States"), on behalf of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has filed a Complaint in this matter pursuant to Section 107 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9607, seeking reimbursement of response costs incurred and to be incurred for response actions taken at or in connection with the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at the Puente Valley Operable Unit ("PVOU"), Area 4, of the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Los Angeles County, California (the "Site").
B. This Consent Decree provides for the reimbursement of a portion of the United States' Past Response Costs at this Site by Hill Brothers Chemical Company, ("Settling Defendant").
C. By entering into this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant does not admit liability to or arising out of the transactions or occurrences alleged in the Complaint or to any other person related to the Site.
D. The United States and Settling Defendant agree, and this Court by entering this Consent Decree finds, that this Consent Decree has been negotiated by the Parties in good faith, that settlement of this matter will avoid prolonged and complicated litigation between the Parties, and that this Consent Decree is fair, reasonable, and in the public interest.
THEREFORE, with the consent of the Parties to this Decree, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1345, 42 U.S.C § 9607, and 9613(b), and also has personal jurisdiction over Settling Defendant in this action. Settling Defendant consents to and shall not challenge entry of this Consent Decree or this Court's jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree.
2. This Consent Decree is binding upon the United States and upon the Settling Defendant and its beneficiaries, heirs, successors, and assigns. Any change in ownership or corporate or other legal status, including but not limited to, any transfer of assets of real or personal property, shall in no way alter the status or responsibilities of Settling Defendant under this Consent Decree.
3. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, terms used in this Consent Decree which are defined in CERCLA or in regulations promulgated under CERCLA shall have the meaning assigned to them in CERCLA or in such regulations. Whenever the terms listed below are used in this Consent Decree, the following definitions shall apply:
a. "Basin-wide Response Costs" shall mean costs, including but not limited to direct and indirect costs, including accrued Interest, that the United States has paid for basin-wide (non-operable unit) response actions in connection with the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites, Areas 1-4.
b. "Carrier Consent Decree" shall mean the consent decree entered on April 28, 2006 in the matter of United States v. Carrier Corporation, Civ. Action No. 05-6022-ABC (FMOx) (C.D. Cal.), relevant portions of which are attached hereto as Appendix A.
c. "CERCLA" shall mean the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq.
d. "Consent Decree" shall mean this Consent Decree and Appendix A attached hereto.
e. "Day" shall mean a calendar day. In computing any period of time under this Consent Decree, where the last day falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, the period shall run until the close of business of the next working day.
f. "DOJ" shall mean the United States Department of Justice and any successor departments, agencies, or instrumentalities of the United States.
g. "Effective Date" shall mean the date of entry of this Consent Decree.
h. "EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency and any successor departments, agencies, or instrumentalities of the United States.
i. "EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund" shall mean the Hazardous Substance Superfund established by the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 9507.
j. "ESD" shall mean the Explanation of Significant Differences issued by EPA on June 14, 2005 for the Record of Decision.
k. "Facility" shall mean the Site.
l. "Future Response Costs" shall mean all costs, including but not limited to Oversight Costs, direct or indirect costs, and Basin-wide Response Costs allocated to the Site, including Interest, that the United States or any third party pays or incurs at or relating to the Site after the date of entry of this Consent Decree, but prior to the later of (i) the date eight (8) years from the Operational and Functional Date of the Carrier Consent Decree, or (ii) the date of issuance of a final Record of Decision for the Site.
m. "Interest" shall mean interest at the applicable rate specified for interest on investments of the Hazardous Substance Superfund established by 26 U.S.C. § 9507, compounded annually on October 1 of each year, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a).
n. "Oversight Costs" shall mean all direct and indirect costs, including Interest, that the United States incurs in connection with monitoring and supervising performance of the Response Work by other persons.
o. "Paragraph" shall mean a portion of this Consent Decree identified by an Arabic numeral or an upper or lower case letter.
P. "Parties" shall mean the United States and the Settling Defendant.
q. "Past Response Costs" shall mean all costs, including but not limited to Oversight Costs, direct and indirect costs, and Basin-wide Response Costs allocated to the Site, including Interest, that the United States or any third party has paid or incurred at or relating to the Site through and including the date of entry of this Consent Decree.
r. "Plaintiff' shall mean the United States.
s. "Record of Decision" or "ROD" shall mean the September 30, 1998 EPA Interim Record of Decision for the Puente Valley Operable Unit (Area 4) of the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites, Areas 1-4.
t. "Response Work" shall mean the design and implementation of any remedial measures, including the operation and maintenance thereof, encompassed within the Record of Decision as modified by the ESD.
u. "Section" shall mean a portion of this Consent Decree identified by a Roman numeral.
v. "Settling Defendant" shall mean Hill Brothers Chemical Company.
w. "Site" shall mean the Facility, which consists of an area of groundwater contamination in Los Angeles County, California, located in the geographic area designated on the National Priorities List as the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Area 4 and identified as the Puente Valley Operable Unit. See 49 Fed. Reg. 19480 (1984).
x. "State" shall mean the State of California.
y. "United States" shall mean the United States of America, including its departments, agencies, and instrumentalities.
4. By entering into this Consent Decree, the mutual objective of the Parties is for Settling Defendant to make a cash payment to address its liability for the Site as provided in the Covenant Not to Sue by Plaintiff in Section VIII, and subject to the Reservations of Rights by the United States in Section VIII, Paragraph 15.
5.
a. Settling Defendant shall, within thirty (30) Days after entry of this Consent Decree, remit the principal of One Hundred Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($135,000) to the United States. Payment to the United States shall be made by FedWire Electronic Funds Transfer ("EFT") to the U.S. Department of Justice in accordance with current EFT procedures, referencing the USAO File Number, EPA Region IX, the Site/Spill ID Number 09-8V, and DOJ Case Number 90-11-2-354/35. Payment shall be made in accordance with instructions provided to Settling Defendant by the Financial Litigation Unit of the United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California following lodging of the Consent Decree. Any payments received by the Department of Justice after 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time shall be credited on the next business Day. Settling Defendant shall send notice to the EPA and the DOJ that payment has been made in accordance with Section XIV (Notices and Submissions) and to David Wood, MTS-4-2, Supervisory Accountant, U.S. EPA, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
b. The One Hundred Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($135,000) paid by Settling Defendant to the United States shall be deposited in the "San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites, Area 4, Special Account" within the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund. This Special Account shall be retained and used to conduct or finance response actions at or in connection with the Site or the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites (Areas 1-4), or may be transferred by EPA from this Special Account to the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund.
6.
7.
a. Settling Defendant shall be liable for stipulated penalties for late payments under Section VI, Paragraph 5.a. (Reimbursement of Response Costs) and for the Interest on late payments under Section VI, Paragraph 5.a. as required under Section VII, Paragraph 6. The stipulated penalties shall be in the following amounts per violation per Day that any such payment is late:
b. Settling Defendant shall be liable for stipulated penalties in the amount of $1,500 per Day per violation of the provisions contained in Sections XII (Access To Information), and XIII (Retention of Records).
8. All Interest and penalties set forth under this Section shall begin to accrue on the Day a violation occurs, and shall continue to accrue through the final Day of the correction of the noncompliance. Nothing herein shall prevent the simultaneous accrual of separate penalties for separate violations of this Consent Decree.
9. Interest and stipulated penalties shall accrue as provided in Paragraphs 6 and 7, regardless of whether EPA has notified Settling Defendant of the violation or made a demand for payment, but need be paid only upon demand.
10. Interest and stipulated penalties set forth under this Section shall be due and payable within thirty (30) Days of the date of demand for payment. All payments to the United States under this Paragraph shall be made by certified or cashier's check made payable to the "EPA Hazardous Substances Superfund," shall be forwarded to the U.S. EPA, Region IX, Superfund Payments, Cincinnati Finance Center, P.O. Box 979076, St. Louis, Missouri 63197-9000, shall indicate that payment is for Interest and/or stipulated penalties, and shall reference EPA Region IX, the Site/Spill Identification Numbers 09-8V, the USA() File Number, the DOJ Case Number 90-11-2-354/35, and the name and address of the party making payment. Copies of check(s) paid pursuant to this Paragraph, and any accompanying transmittal letter(s), shall be forwarded to DOJ and EPA as provided in Section XIV (Notices and Submissions), and to David Wood, MTS-4-2, Supervisory Accountant, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105.
11. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section, the United States may, in its unreviewable discretion, waive any portion of Interest or stipulated penalties that have accrued pursuant to this Consent Decree.
12. Payments made under this Section shall be in addition to any other remedies or sanctions available to Plaintiff by virtue of Settling Defendant's failure to comply with the requirements of this Consent Decree.
13. If the United States brings an action against Settling Defendant to enforce this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant shall reimburse the United States for all costs of such action, including but not limited to costs of attorney time.
14.
15.
a. liability for failure by Settling Defendant to meet a requirement of this Consent Decree;
b. liability for damages for injury to, destruction of, or loss of natural resources, and for the costs of any natural resource damage assessments;
c. criminal liability; and
d. liability for response actions and response costs incurred or to be incurred by the United States not covered as matters addressed as set forth in Paragraph 21 of this Consent Decree, including but not limited to liability for any response actions and response costs at the Site that occur after the later of (i) the date eight (8) years from the Operational and Functional Date of the Carrier Consent Decree, or (ii) the date of issuance of a final Record of Decision for the Site.
16. Settling Defendant covenants not to sue and agrees not to assert any claims or causes of action against Plaintiff or its contractors or employees with respect to Response Work, Past Response Costs, and Future Response Costs, as set forth in this Consent Decree, including but not limited to:
a. any direct or indirect claims for reimbursement from the Hazardous Substance Superfund based on Sections 106(b)(2), 107, 111, 112, or 113 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9606(b)(2), 9607, 9611, 9612, or 9613, or any other provision of law;
b. any claims arising out of costs or response actions at or in connection with the Site, including any claim under the United States Constitution, the California Constitution, the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, as amended, or at common law; and
c. any claims against the United States pursuant to Sections 107 and 113 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and 9613, related to the Site.
17. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be deemed to constitute approval or preauthorization of a claim within the meaning of Section 111 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9611, or 40 C.F.R. § 300.700(d).
18. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to create any rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any person not a Party to this Consent Decree. The preceding sentence shall not be construed to waive or nullify any rights that any person not a signatory to this Decree may have under applicable law. Each of the Parties expressly reserves any and all rights (including, but not limited to, any right to contribution), defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action which each Party may have with respect to any matter, transaction, or occurrence relating in any way to the Site against any person not a Party hereto.
19. The Parties agree that in consideration of the payment made by Settling Defendant and the execution of this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant has resolved its liability to Plaintiff and is entitled to protection from contribution actions or claims as provided by Section 113(f)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(2), for matters addressed in this Consent Decree, conditioned only upon entry of this Consent Decree. The matters addressed in this Consent Decree are: Response Work; Past Response Costs; and Future Response Costs. The matters addressed exclude those response actions and response costs to which Plaintiff has reserved its rights under this Consent Decree.
20. Settling Defendant agrees that, with respect to any suit or claim for contribution brought by Settling Defendant for matters related to this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant will notify DOJ and EPA, in writing not later than sixty (60) Days prior to the initiation of such suit or claim. Settling Defendant also agrees that, with respect to any suit or claim for contribution brought against Settling Defendant for matters related to this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant will notify DOJ and EPA in writing within ten (10) Days of service of the complaint or claims upon Settling Defendant. In addition, Settling Defendant shall notify DOJ and EPA within ten (10) Days of service or receipt of any motion for summary judgment or any order from a court setting a case for trial, for matters related to this Consent Decree.
21. In any subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding initiated by the United States for injunctive relief, recovery of response costs, or other relief relating to the Site, Settling Defendant shall not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claims based upon the principles of waiver, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim-splitting, or other defenses based upon any contention that the claims raised by the United States in the subsequent proceeding were or should have been brought in the instant case; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph affects the enforceability of the Covenant Not to Sue by Plaintiff set forth in Section VIII.
22. Commencing upon the date of lodging of this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant agrees to provide the United States and the State of California and their representatives, including the EPA, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, and the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board, and their contractors, access at all reasonable times to the property within the Site owned or controlled by Settling Defendant to which access is determined by the EPA to be required for the implementation of this Consent Decree, or for the purpose of conducting any response activity related to the Site, including but not limited to:
a. Monitoring of investigation, removal, remedial or other activities at the Site;
b. Verifying any data or information submitted to the United States or to the State of California;
c. Conducting investigations relating to contamination at or near the Site;
d. Obtaining samples;
e. Assessing the need for, planning, or implementing response actions at or near the Site; and
f. Inspecting and copying records, operating logs, contracts, or other documents maintained or generated by Settling Defendant or its agents, consistent with Section XII (Access to Information).
23. Notwithstanding any provision of this Consent Decree, the United States retains all of its access authorities and rights, including enforcement authorities related thereto, under CERCLA, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, and any other applicable statutes or regulations.
24. Settling Defendant shall provide to Plaintiff, upon request, copies of all documents and information within its possession or control or that of its contractors or agents relating in any manner to response actions taken at the Site or the liability of any person for response actions conducted and to be conducted at the Site, including, but not limited to, sampling, analysis, chain of custody records, manifests, trucking logs, receipts, reports, sample traffic routing, correspondence, or other documents or information related to the Site.
25.
a. Settling Defendant may assert business confidentiality claims covering part or all of the documents or information submitted to Plaintiff under this Consent Decree to the extent permitted by and in accordance with Section 104(e)(7) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e)(7), and 40 C.F.R. § 2.203(b). Documents or information determined to be confidential by Plaintiff will be accorded the protection specified in 40 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart B. If no claim of confidentiality accompanies documents or information when they are submitted to the Plaintiff, or if Plaintiff has notified Settling Defendant that the documents or information are not confidential under the standards of Section 104(e)(7) of CERCLA, the public may be given access to such documents or information without further notice to Settling Defendant.
b. Settling Defendant may assert that certain documents, records, or other information are privileged under the attorney-client privilege or any other privilege recognized by federal law. If Settling Defendant asserts such a privilege in lieu of providing documents, it shall provide Plaintiff with the following: 1) the title of the document, record, or information; 2) the date of the document, record, or information; 3) the name and title of the author of the document, record, or information; 4) the name and title of each addressee and recipient; 5) a description of the subject of the document, record or information; and 6) the privilege asserted. However, no documents, reports, or other information created or generated pursuant to the requirements of this or any other consent decree with Plaintiff shall be withheld on the grounds that they are privileged. If a claim of privilege applies only to a portion of a document, the document shall be provided to Plaintiff in redacted form to mask the privileged information only. Settling Defendant shall retain all records and documents that it claims to be privileged until Plaintiff has had a reasonable opportunity to dispute the privilege claim and any such dispute has been resolved in Settling Defendant's favor.
26. No claim of confidentiality shall be made with respect to any data, including but not limited to, all sampling, analytical, monitoring, hydrogeologic, scientific, chemical, or engineering data, or any other documents or information evidencing conditions at or around the Site.
27. Until ten (10) years after the entry of this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant shall preserve and retain all records and documents now in its possession or control, or which come into its possession or control thereafter, that relate in any manner to response actions taken at the Site or the liability of any person for response actions conducted and to be conducted at the Site, regardless of any corporate retention policy to the contrary. After five (5) years, Settling Defendant may contact EPA in writing to request instructions as to whether such records and documents shall be maintained for the remaining five (5) year retention period, or whether such records and documents may be discarded. No retained records or documents shall be disposed of prior to the ten (10) year retention period, unless Settling Defendant receives instructions from EPA specifically permitting Settling Defendant to dispose of such records and documents.
28. After the conclusion of the ten (10) year document retention period in the preceding Paragraph, Settling Defendant shall notify EPA and DOJ at least ninety (90) Days prior to the destruction of any such records or documents, and, upon request by EPA or DOJ, Settling Defendant shall deliver any such records or documents to EPA subject to the same privilege provisions set forth in Section XII (Access To Information).
29. By signing this Consent Decree, Settling Defendant certifies that, after thorough inquiry, to the best of its knowledge and belief, Settling Defendant has not altered, mutilated, discarded, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of any records, documents, or other information relating to their potential liability regarding the Site, after notification of potential liability or the filing of a suit against Settling Defendant regarding the Site; and that Settling Defendant has fully complied with any and all EPA requests for information regarding the Site pursuant to Sections 104(e) and 122(e) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9604(e) and 9622(e), and Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927.
30. Whenever, under the terms of this Consent Decree, notice is required to be given or a document is required to be forwarded by one party to another, it shall be directed to the individuals at the addresses specified below, unless those individuals or their successors give notice of a change to the other Parties in writing. Written notice as specified herein shall constitute complete satisfaction of any written notice requirement of the Consent Decree with respect to the United States (DOJ and EPA) and Settling Defendant, respectively.
Settling Defendant may change the identity or contact information for its agent at any time by written notice to the Court and to the United States.
31. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the terms of this Consent Decree.
32. This Consent Decree and its appendix constitute the final, complete, and exclusive agreement and understanding among the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied in this Consent Decree. The Parties acknowledge that there are no representations, agreements, or understandings relating to the settlement other than those expressly contained in this Consent Decree. The following appendix is attached to and incorporated into this Consent Decree: "Appendix A," which is the relevant portion of the Carrier Consent Decree.
33. This Consent Decree shall be lodged with the Court for a period of not less than thirty (30) Days for public notice and comment. The United States reserves the right to withdraw or withhold its consent if the comments regarding the Consent Decree disclose facts or considerations which indicate that this Consent Decree is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Settling Defendant consents to the entry of this Consent Decree without further notice.
34. If for any reason this Court should decline to approve this Consent Decree in the form presented, this agreement is voidable at the sole discretion of any party and the terms of the agreement may not be used as evidence in any litigation between the Parties.
35. The effective date of this Consent Decree shall be the date upon which it is entered by the Court.
36. Each undersigned representative of Settling Defendant and the Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the United States Department of Justice, certifies that he or she is authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree and to execute and bind legally such Party to this document.
37. Settling Defendant hereby agrees not to oppose entry of this Consent Decree by this Court or to challenge any provision of this Consent Decree, unless the United States has notified Settling Defendant in writing that it no longer supports entry of the Consent Decree.
38. Settling Defendant shall identify, on the attached signature page, the name and address of an agent who is authorized to accept service of process by mail on behalf of that Party with respect to all matters arising under or relating to this Consent Decree. Settling Defendant hereby agrees to accept service in that manner and to waive the formal service requirements set forth in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and any applicable local rules of this Court, including, but not limited to, service of a summons.
39. Upon approval and entry of this Consent Decree by this Court, this Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment between the United States and Settling Defendant. The Court finds that there is no just reason for delay and therefore enters this judgment as the final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58.
SO ORDERED.
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree, relating to the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Area 4, and further identified as the Puente Valley Operable Unit.
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree, relating to the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Area 4, and further identified as the Puente Valley Operable Unit.
2. This Consent Decree applies to and is binding upon the United States and upon Settling Defendants and their successors and assigns. Any change in ownership or corporate status of a Settling Defendant including, but not limited to, any transfer of assets or real or personal property, shall in no way alter such Settling Defendant's responsibilities under this Consent Decree.
3. Settling Defendants shall provide a copy of this Consent Decree to each contractor hired to perform the Work (as defined below) required by this Consent Decree and to each person representing any Settling Defendant with respect to the Site or the Work and shall condition all contracts entered into hereunder upon performance of the Work in conformity with the terms of this Consent Decree. Settling Defendants or their contractors shall provide written notice of the Consent Decree to all subcontractors hired to perform any portion of the Work required by this Consent Decree. Settling Defendants shall nonetheless be responsible for ensuring that their contractors and subcontractors perform the Work contemplated herein in accordance with this Consent Decree. With regard to the activities undertaken pursuant to this Consent Decree, each contractor and subcontractor shall be deemed to be in a contractual relationship with the Settling Defendants within the meaning of Section 107(b)(3) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(b)(3).
4. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, terms used in this Consent Decree that are defined in CERCLA or in regulations promulgated under CERCLA shall have the meaning assigned to them in CERCLA or in such regulations. Whenever terms listed below are used in this Consent Decree or in the appendices attached hereto and incorporated hereunder, the following definitions shall apply:
"Basin-wide Response Costs" shall mean costs, including but not limited to direct and indirect costs, including accrued Interest, that the United States has incurred or in the future incurs for basin-wide (non-operable unit) response actions in connection with the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites, Areas 1 — 4.
"CERCLA" shall mean the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601,
"Day" shall mean a calendar day unless expressly stated to be a working day. "Working Day" shall mean a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. In computing any period of time under this Consent Decree, where the last day would fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period shall run until the close of business of the next working day.
"DOJ" shall mean the United States Department of Justice and any of its successor departments, agencies, or instrumentalities.
"DTSC" shall mean the California Department of Toxic Substances Control and any successor departments or agencies.
"Effective Date" shall be the effective date of this Consent Decree as provided in Paragraph
"Eligible SEP Costs" shall include the costs of implementing the Supplemental Environmental Project (SEP) required pursuant to Section XVIII, but do not include Settling Defendants' overhead, administrative expenses or legal fees. Contractor oversight costs not exceeding 5% of $468,750 may be included as Eligible SEP Costs, so long as adequate documentation is provided.
"EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency and any of its successor departments or agencies.
"Explanation of Significant Differences" or "ESD" shall mean the Explanation of Significant differences relating to the Site issued by EPA on June 14, 2005. The ESD is attached as Appendix B to this Consent Decree.
"Future Response Costs" shall mean all costs that are incurred by the United States or any third party for response actions with respect to the Site after the Effective Date, but prior to the later of (i) the date 8 years from the Operational and Functional Date, or (ii) the date of issuance of a final Record of Decision for the Site. Future Response Costs include, but are not limited to, Basin-wide Response Costs allocated to the Site, direct and indirect costs and accrued interest that the United States incurs in reviewing or developing plans, reports, and other items pursuant to this Consent Decree, verifying the Work, or otherwise implementing, overseeing, or enforcing this Consent Decree, including but not limited to payroll costs, contractor costs, travel costs, laboratory costs, the costs incurred pursuant to Sections VII (Remedy Review), IX (Access and Institutional Controls; including but not limited to the cost of attorney time and any monies paid to secure access or to secure or implement institutional controls including but not limited to the amount of just compensation), XV (Emergency Response), and Paragraph
"Interest," shall mean interest at the rate specified for interest on investments of the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund established by 26 U.S.C. § 9507, compounded annually on October 1 of each year, in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). The applicable rate of interest shall be the rate in effect at the time the interest accrues. The rate of interest is subject to change on October 1 of each year.
"Interim ROD" shall mean the Interim Record of Decision relating to the Puente Valley Operable Unit of the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Sites signed on September, 30 1998 by the Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9, or his/her delegate, and all attachments thereto. The Interim ROD is attached as Appendix A to this Consent Decree.
"Mid-Valley Monitoring" shall mean the installation and monitoring of wells in the intermediate and deep groundwater zones in the mid-valley area of the Site to monitor vertical and horizontal contaminant migration in such groundwater zones, as set forth in the SOW. For purposes of this Consent Decree, the mid-valley shall extend from Azusa Avenue to Puente Creek.
"National Contingency Plan" or "NCP" shall mean the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9605, and codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 300, and any amendments thereto.
"Operational and Functional" shall mean that the Remedial Action, or a phase thereof, has been constructed and that it is performing in accordance with the applicable SOW and the applicable final Remedial Design/ Remedial Action Work Plans and other plans approved by EPA.
"Operational and Functional Date" shall mean the date that all phases of the Remedial Action are Operational and Functional pursuant to Paragraph
"Paragraph" shall mean a portion of this Consent Decree identified by an Arabic numeral or an upper case letter.
"Parties" shall mean the United States and the Settling Defendants.
"Past Response Costs" shall mean all costs, including but not limited to Basin-wide Response Costs allocated to the Site, direct and indirect costs, including Interest, that the United States or any third party has paid or incurred at or in connection with the Site, through and including the Effective Date.
"Performance Criteria" shall mean the prevention of groundwater in the shallow zone north of Puente Creek at the mouth of Puente Valley with contamination greater than or equal to ten-times the levels listed in Table 2 of the ESD from:
"Plaintiff' shall mean the United States.
"RCRA" shall mean the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901
"Remedial Action" shall mean those activities to be undertaken by Settling Defendants to implement the shallow zone remedy north of Puente Creek and Mid-Valley Monitoring, in accordance with the Interim ROD as modified by the ESD, the applicable SOW, and the applicable Remedial Design/ Remedial Action Work Plans and other plans approved by EPA.
"Remedial Action Work Plan" shall mean the document developed pursuant to Paragraph
"Remedial Design" shall mean those activities to be undertaken by Settling Defendants to develop the final plans and specifications for the Remedial Action pursuant to the Remedial Design Work Plan.
"Remedial Design Work Plan" shall mean the document developed pursuant to Paragraph
"Section" shall mean a portion of this Consent Decree identified by a Roman numeral.
"SEP" shall mean the Woodland Duck Farm Supplemental Environmental Project as described in Paragraph 62, or any alternative Supplemental Environmental Project approved by EPA pursuant to Paragraph 63.
"SEP Implementation Plan" shall the mean the document describing the SEP and setting forth those activities required to implement the SEP.
"Settling Defendants" shall mean Carrier Corporation and United Technologies Corporation.
"Site" shall mean the area of groundwater contamination in Los Angeles County, California, located in the geographic area designated on the National Priorities List as the San Gabriel Valley Superfund Site, Area 4 [
"State" shall mean the California Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC").
"Statement of Work" or "SOW shall mean the statement of work for implementation of the Remedial Design and Remedial Action at the Site, as set forth in Appendix D to this Consent Decree and any modifications made in accordance with this Consent Decree.
"Supervising Contractor" shall mean the principal contractor retained by the Settling Defendants to supervise and direct the implementation of the Work under this Consent Decree.
"Unilateral Administrative Order Docket No. 2001-20" or "UAO Docket No. 2001-20" shall mean the order issued by EPA to Carrier Corporation on or about September 13, 2001.
"United States" shall mean the United States of America.
"Waste Material" shall mean (1) any "hazardous substance" under Section 101(14) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14); (2) any pollutant or contaminant under Section 101(33) of CERCLA 42 U.S.C. § 9601(33); (3) any "solid waste" under Section 1004(27) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6903(27); and (4) any "hazardous material" under the California Hazardous Waste Control Act Section 25100
"Work" shall mean all activities Settling Defendants are required to perform under this Consent Decree, except those required by Section XXVI (Retention of Records) and Section XVIII (Supplemental Environmental Projects).
5.
a. Within 30 Days after Settling Defendants conclude that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional, Settling Defendants shall schedule and conduct a pre-certification inspection to be attended by Settling Defendants and EPA. If, after the pre-certification inspection, the Settling Defendants still believe that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional, they shall submit a written report requesting certification to EPA for approval, with a copy to the State, pursuant to Section XI (EPA Approval of Plans and Other Submissions) within 30 Days of the inspection. In the report, a registered professional engineer and the Settling Defendants' Project Coordinator shall state that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional. The written report shall include as-built drawings signed and stamped by a professional engineer. The report shall contain the following statement, signed by a responsible corporate official of a Settling Defendant or the Settling Defendants' Project Coordinator:
If, after completion of the pre-certification inspection and receipt and review of the written report, EPA, after reasonable opportunity to review and comment by DTSC, determines that the Remedial Action is not Operational and Functional, EPA will notify Settling Defendants in writing of the activities that must be undertaken by Settling Defendants pursuant to this Consent Decree in order for the Remedial Action to be Operational and Functional. EPA will set forth in the notice a schedule for performance of such activities consistent with the Consent Decree and the SOW or require the Settling Defendants to submit a schedule to EPA for approval pursuant to Section XI (EPA Approval of Plans and Other Submissions). Settling Defendants shall perform all activities described in the notice in accordance with the specifications and schedules established pursuant to this Paragraph, subject to their right to invoke the dispute resolution procedures set forth in Section XX (Dispute Resolution).
b. If EPA concludes, based on the initial or any subsequent report requesting certification, and after a reasonable opportunity for review and comment by DTSC, that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional, EPA will so certify in writing to Settling Defendants.
c. If EPA fails to certify that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional within 90 Days after a request, EPA shall be deemed to have denied the request, unless Settling Defendants agree to an extension of time. Settling Defendants may, at any time thereafter, invoke Dispute Resolution pursuant to Section XX (Dispute Resolution).
d. Nothing herein shall preclude Settling Defendants from requesting, and EPA from granting, pursuant to the same procedures set forth in Subparagraphs a-c of this Paragraph, certification that a phase of the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional; provided, however, that any such certification shall be conditioned on such phase remaining Operational and Functional at the time Settling Defendants request certification for the final phase of the Remedial Action. In the event Settling Defendants request certification that a phase of the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional, and such request is granted, the resulting certification shall not affect the Operational and Functional Date.
e. Upon approval of the certification report by EPA or pursuant to a ruling by the Court, the Operational and Functional Date shall be the date when the last report requesting certification of the final phase of the Remedial Action was submitted.
f. The Operational and Functional Date established pursuant to this Paragraph shall not be affected if existing contamination greater than or equal to ten-times the levels listed in Table 2 of the SOW has migrated vertically into the intermediate zone and this existing contamination prevents Settling Defendants' from meeting the Performance Criteria, provided the Settling Defendants are taking the response actions determined by EPA to be necessary to reverse the trend pursuant to the SOW.
g. Once EPA has determined that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional pursuant to this Paragraph, the Operational and Functional Date shall not be affected in the event EPA subsequently determines, pursuant to Paragraph 13, that modification to the Work specified in the SOW or in work plans developed pursuant to the SOW is necessary to achieve and maintain the Performance Criteria, to meet discharge ARARs, or to implement Mid-Valley Monitoring.
a. No later than 90 Days before, and no sooner than 120 Days prior to, the eight-year anniversary of the Operational and Functional Date, and upon Settling Defendants concluding that the Remedial Action is still Operational and Functional, Settling Defendants shall schedule a pre-certification inspection to be attended by Settling Defendants and EPA. The Settling Defendants shall submit a Facility Status Package to EPA which shall include, but not be limited to, all maintenance reports, performance reports, sampling results, and all other deliverables updated as appropriate to reflect the performance and condition of the containment and Mid-Valley Monitoring systems including all wells, pipelines, and treatment facilities. If, after the pre-certification inspection, the Settling Defendants still believe that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional, Settling Defendants shall submit a written report by a registered professional engineer, in accordance with the SOW, stating that the Remedial Action is Operational and Functional. The report shall contain the following statement,
