GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.
The parties, by and through their counsel of record, jointly request that the Court modify the Scheduling Conference Order entered on October 6, 2014 (Docket #11) as follows:
These requested changes do not affect the trial date or any other deadlines. The parties jointly seek these changes for the reasons set forth in this stipulated request.
1. This action was filed on April 8. 2014. The Court initially set a scheduling conference for July 10, 2014. (Docket # 3) That date was later changed to September 15, 2014. (Docket # 6) The Court issued its Scheduling Conference Order on October 6, 2014, which included a directive that the parties contact the court if they believed a settlement conference would be beneficial. (Docket # 11) The parties asked that an early settlement conference be held.
2. Pursuant to the parties' request, an order setting a settlement conference was issued on November 12, 2014. (Docket # 12) The Court conducted a settlement conference session on January 20, 2015. Although no settlement was reached on that date, with the Court's encouragement the parties agreed to continue settlement discussions. A further settlement conference is set for March 5, 2015.
3. Both parties timely made their initial disclosures, as required by Rule 26. The depositions of Plaintiff and a key defense witness were taken before the January settlement conference. Both parties agree there are several more depositions that need to be taken and records that need to be obtained from third parties via subpoenas. Both parties anticipate retaining expert witnesses. Due to the considerable expenses that accompany these actions, carrying them out concurrently with settlement negotiations may impede the latter process, rather than enhance the possibility of a resolution. Accordingly, the parties request that the Scheduling Conference Order be slightly modified to allow them to put all resources toward getting the case settled, yet still have adequate time to complete expert and non-expert discovery if no resolution is reach.
4. In light of the ongoing settlement activities, the parties jointly request the following modification to the Scheduling Conference Order:
The Court adopts the parties' stipulation set forth above. Accordingly, the Scheduling Order entered on October 26, 2014 (Doc. 11), is modified as follows: expert disclosure deadline extended to July 10, 2015; non-expert discovery cut-off extended to September 25, 2015; and expert discovery cut-off extended to October 16, 2015. In addition, the non-dispositive motion filing deadline shall be October 30, 2015. Other dates and deadlines specified in the Scheduling Order remain in full force and effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.