Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

H.S. v. AQUA EMPS BOOSTER CLUB, 1:14-CV-00399-AWI-SAB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140505989 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 02, 2014
Latest Update: May 02, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT STANLEY A. BOONE, District Judge. STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Plaintiffs and Defendant, DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT by and through their respective counsel, that DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT shall be granted an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint in the matter of SHAMP et al v. AQUA EMPS BOOSTER CLUB, aka DINUBA AQUA E
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

STANLEY A. BOONE, District Judge.

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the Plaintiffs and Defendant, DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT by and through their respective counsel, that DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT shall be granted an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint in the matter of SHAMP et al v. AQUA EMPS BOOSTER CLUB, aka DINUBA AQUA EMPS, a nonprofit California corporation; et al,.

The parties hereby stipulate and agree that DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT shall respond to Plaintiffs' March 20, 2014 Complaint pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation on or before Tuesday, June 3, 2014.

This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile signature, each of which, when executed, shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one in the same Stipulation. This Stipulation contains the entire agreement among the signing parties.

The undersigned hereby consents to the terms set forth in the foregoing Stipulation.

ORDER OF THE COURT REGARDING STIPULATION

Pursuant to the Stipulation and Agreement of counsel for the parties and FOR GOOD CAUSE showing, the Court ORDERS that Defendant DINUBA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT shall have until Tuesday, June 3, 2014 to respond to Plaintiffs' March 20, 2014 Complaint for Damages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer