Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Scott v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC, 3:16-cv-06869-EMC. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170808b10 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Pursuant to Northern District Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiffs Andre Scott, Ken Fassler, and Elijah Maxwell-Wilson ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC ("Comcast") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to continue the mediation completion deadline and Case Manage
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Plaintiffs Andre Scott, Ken Fassler, and Elijah Maxwell-Wilson ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC ("Comcast") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to continue the mediation completion deadline and Case Management Conference currently set for August 1, 2017 and August 10, 2017, respectively. Good cause exists for such continuance based upon the following, to which the Parties have met and conferred and agreed:

WHEREAS, on March 2, 2017 (ECF No. 30), the Court issued Civil Minutes setting an August 10, 2017 Case Management Conference and an August 1, 2017 mediation completion deadline;

WHEREAS, the parties have exchanged initial discovery;

WHEREAS, since June, Plaintiffs have been evaluating Comcast's discovery responses and Comcast's initial 2,411 page document production;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are still in the process of reaching decisions regarding the scope of mediation;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have not agreed to use any of the mediators proposed by Comcast, and therefore the Parties are still in the process of selecting a mediator;

WHEREAS, the Parties believe that there is good cause to continue the mediation deadline from August 1, 2017 to August 25, 2017 to explore resolution of this case. The Parties further agree it would be more efficient and productive to continue the Case Management Conference to from August 10, 2017 to September 7, 2017 to allow the parties time to explore resolution of this case.

WHEREAS, the Parties have not made any prior requests to continue court-ordered deadlines in this case;

WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated to extend Defendant's deadline to file its responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' Complaint and First Amended Complaint (See Docket Nos. 6, 16, 24);

WHEREAS, the requested continuances will not otherwise affect this case's schedule;

THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that the Court continue the mediation completion deadline from August 1, 2017 to August 25, 2017, and the Case Management Conference from August 10, 2017 to September 14, 2017, or a date after September 7, 2017 that is convenient for the Court. The parties will file their joint statement at least seven (7) days before the scheduled conference.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION RE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES

I, DARYL S. LANDY, attest pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that all other signatories to this document, on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation to Continue Mediation Completion Deadline and Case Management Conference, the Court hereby continues the Mediation Completion Deadline to August 25, 2017 and the Case Management Conference to September 14, 2017 at 10:30 am. An updated Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed by September 7, 2017.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer