Filed: Sep. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 43) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Wayne Bolton, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on May 3, 2018, based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 34.) On September 7, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for a protective order to stay d
Summary: ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 43) SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, Wayne Bolton, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on May 3, 2018, based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 34.) On September 7, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for a protective order to stay di..
More
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(Doc. 43)
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Wayne Bolton, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on May 3, 2018, based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (Doc. 34.)
On September 7, 2018, Defendants filed a motion for a protective order to stay discovery pending resolution of their motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 43.) Defendants indicate that two days after Plaintiff requested an extension of time to file an opposition to their motion, Plaintiff served discovery on the merits of his claims, rather than on exhaustion issues. (Id.) The Court notes that having been notified of the requirements to oppose the motion for summary judgment, Plaintiff filed an opposition, instead of requesting postponement of consideration of Defendants' motion, to conduct further discovery on the exhaustion issue under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Doc. 41.)
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for a stay of discovery pending resolution of the motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust, filed by Defendants on September 9, 2018, (Doc. 34), is GRANTED and all discovery is STAYED in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
