Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS & RECREATION v. NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION, 2:12-CV-01857-LKK-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140415754 Visitors: 19
Filed: Apr. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING CONSISTENCY WITH NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN (NCP) LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. In the interests of judicial economy, and to facilitate an efficient use of the Court's and the parties' time in advance of and during the trial scheduled to begin on February 3, 2015, parties to the above-entitled action, having met and conferred, through their respective counsel hereby stipulate to the following for purposes of this litigation: 1. Any actions taken (and costs incurred
More

STIPULATION REGARDING CONSISTENCY WITH NATIONAL CONTINGENCY PLAN (NCP)

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

In the interests of judicial economy, and to facilitate an efficient use of the Court's and the parties' time in advance of and during the trial scheduled to begin on February 3, 2015, parties to the above-entitled action, having met and conferred, through their respective counsel hereby stipulate to the following for purposes of this litigation:

1. Any actions taken (and costs incurred associated therewith) after issuance of the 2006 Cleanup and Abatement Order (2006 Order) issued by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) in the matter of Empire Mine State Historic Park (DTSC Docket No. HSA-CO 06/07-101; Water Board Order No. R5-2006-0731) and prior to September 30, 2012, by State Parks or Newmont in the performance of remediation work outlined in the 2006 Order (specifically Section 4.1) and any subsequent amendments or modifications to the Order as well as the 2009 Cleanup and Abatement Order issued by the DTSC and Water Board in the matter of Empire Mine State Historic Park (DTSC Docket No. HSA-CO 09/10-027; Water Board Order No. R5-2009-0714) and the 2011 Cleanup and Abatement Order issued by the DTSC and Water Board in the matter of Empire Mine State Historic Park (DTSC Docket No. HSA-CO 11/12-008; Water Board Order No. R5-2011-0705), are consistent with the National Contingency Plan (NCP) promulgated under Section 105(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Section 9605(a), codified at 40 C.F.R. Part 300.

2. Consistent with Paragraph 1, the parties agree that each party has incurred necessary response costs consistent with the NCP for purposes of establishing CERCLA liability under 42 U.S.C. Section 9607(a)(4)(A) or (B).

3. Notwithstanding Paragraphs 1 and 2 and to the extent otherwise allowed at law, the parties agree that each party shall have the right to challenge any actions taken by the other party (and costs incurred associated therewith) described in Paragraph 1, on either of the following grounds: (a) the costs are not necessary costs of response; and (b) documentation of the costs is not sufficient.

4. Nothing in this stipulation is intended to constitute a representation by either party that for purposes of the cleanup any of the remedial actions performed on the property are complete.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer