JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Janet Perkins ("Plaintiff") filed her Complaint in this action on November 1, 2016 and served Defendant Experian Information Solutions ("Experian") on November 22, 2016, at the same time that Plaintiff's attorney served numerous other complaints on Experian. Given the large volume of complaints requiring a response from Experian at the same time, and in accordance with Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff and Experian have agreed to an extension for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 1, 2017. To the extent that Experian files a motion to dismiss in this case, for the same considerations, Experian agrees that Plaintiff shall have 30 days to respond. Experian will thereupon have 21 days for any reply.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Experian, that the deadline for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until February 1, 2017, Plaintiff's deadline to respond to any motion to dismiss is extended to 30 days from filing, and Experian's deadline to reply in support of a motion to dismiss is extended to 21 days from filing the opposition.

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, Valerie McConnell, hereby attest pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45 that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

Executed this 5th day of December, 2016, at Palo Alto, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, hereby extends Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 1, 2017.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. It is further ordered that, in the event a motion to dismiss is filed, the parties' proposed briefing schedule shall apply.