Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DxO Labs SAS v. Marvell International Ltd., 5:17-cv-2927. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180105738 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 04, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff DxO Labs SAS ("Plaintiff") filed this action for breach of contract against Marvell International Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"); and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendants and their respective counsel of record participated in a settlement meeting between the Parties and their counsel mediated by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

WHEREAS, Plaintiff DxO Labs SAS ("Plaintiff") filed this action for breach of contract against Marvell International Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants"); and

WHEREAS, on December 5, 2017, Plaintiff and Defendants and their respective counsel of record participated in a settlement meeting between the Parties and their counsel mediated by U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a written Settlement Agreement, effective December 20, 2017;

THEREFORE, PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT HEREBY STIPULATE, by and through their respective counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), to dismiss the above-captioned matter with prejudice. This stipulation and dismissal completely terminates the above-entitled action. Each party will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. The parties hereto also request, and Magistrate Judge Corley has agreed, that Magistrate Judge Corley—or in the event of her unavailability, another judge or magistrate as designated by the then-Chief Magistrate Judge of the District Court for the Northern District of California—retain jurisdiction in order to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefor, orders as follows:

1. The action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1), 2. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 3. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley—or in the event of her unavailability, another judge or magistrate as designated by the then-Chief Magistrate Judge of the District Court for the Northern District of California—shall retain jurisdiction of this matter in order to enforce the terms of the December 20, 2017 Settlement Agreement.

It is so ordered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer