Filed: Jul. 18, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THIRD AMENDED ANSWER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 and subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("Bureau") and Defendants and Counter-claimant Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. ("Nationwide"), Loan Payment Administration LLC, and Daniel S. Lipsky
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THIRD AMENDED ANSWER RICHARD SEEBORG , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 and subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("Bureau") and Defendants and Counter-claimant Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. ("Nationwide"), Loan Payment Administration LLC, and Daniel S. Lipsky (..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THIRD AMENDED ANSWER
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12 and subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("Bureau") and Defendants and Counter-claimant Nationwide Biweekly Administration, Inc. ("Nationwide"), Loan Payment Administration LLC, and Daniel S. Lipsky (collectively, "Defendants") state, stipulate, and agree as follows:
1. On July 5, 2016, the Bureau moved to dismiss Nationwide's Counterclaims and to strike portions of Defendants' Third Amended Answer ("Motions"). Dkt. No. 86. The hearing on the Bureau's Motions is set for August 4, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. with responses due by July 19, 2016 and replies due by July 26, 2016.
2. Due to defense counsel's trial schedule in another matter, Defendants and Counter-claimant have requested that the Bureau stipulate to moving the hearing date and all deadlines related thereto one week.
3. Plaintiff has no objection to this request.
4. The parties jointly propose the following briefing schedule and hearing date:
a. July 26, 2016: Defendants' responses to the Motions;
b. August 2, 2016: The Bureau's replies to Defendants' responses, if any; and
c. August 11, 2016, at 1:30 p.m.: Hearing on the Bureau's Motions.
5. This proposed schedule would not otherwise affect the schedule for the case.
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED:
ECF ATTESTATION
I Georgia Z. Schneider, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this document. I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
