Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hernandez v. MP California, 3:16-cv-03015-JCS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160809777 Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R.6-1(a).] JOSEPH C. SPERO , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to the United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rules, Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Jose Hernandez and Giovanni Hernandez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants MP NEXLEVEL, LLC and MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 6-1(a), the respective a
More

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R.6-1(a).]

Pursuant to the United States District Court, Northern District of California Local Rules, Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs Jose Hernandez and Giovanni Hernandez ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants MP NEXLEVEL, LLC and MP NEXLEVEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. ("Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 6-1(a), the respective attorneys for Plaintiffs and Defendants agree that Defendants will have until and including Friday, August 19, 2016 to respond or otherwise plead to the First Amended Complaint, unless a subsequent order of the Court extends or has the effect of further extending the time for Defendants to respond or otherwise plead to the Complaint. Current Court ordered event dates or deadlines are not affected by this stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

I hereby attest that all signatories listed above, on whose behalf this stipulation is submitted, concur in the filing's content and have authorized the filing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer