James v. Tempur Sealy International, Inc., 18-cv-07130-SI. (2019)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20190627898
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Re: Dkt. No. 50. SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Defendant has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to respond to the Amended Complaint, which plaintiff filed pro se on June 20, 2019. Dkt. No. 50. The Court GRANTS defendant's motion for an extension of time and clarifies that this case remains STAYED pending appointment of pro bono counsel for plaintiff. See Dkt. No. 44. No answer shall be due from defendant until the Court
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Re: Dkt. No. 50. SUSAN ILLSTON , District Judge . Defendant has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to respond to the Amended Complaint, which plaintiff filed pro se on June 20, 2019. Dkt. No. 50. The Court GRANTS defendant's motion for an extension of time and clarifies that this case remains STAYED pending appointment of pro bono counsel for plaintiff. See Dkt. No. 44. No answer shall be due from defendant until the Court l..
More
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Re: Dkt. No. 50.
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Defendant has filed a motion seeking an extension of time to respond to the Amended Complaint, which plaintiff filed pro se on June 20, 2019. Dkt. No. 50. The Court GRANTS defendant's motion for an extension of time and clarifies that this case remains STAYED pending appointment of pro bono counsel for plaintiff. See Dkt. No. 44. No answer shall be due from defendant until the Court lifts the stay and/or orders otherwise.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
