Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Johnson, 8:16CR241. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180530e34 Visitors: 16
Filed: May 29, 2018
Latest Update: May 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant Sherman Johnson Jr.'s ("Johnson") Motion for New Trial and Request for Hearing Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Filing No. 146). Although the title of Johnson's motion requests a hearing, nothing in the text of the motion asks for a hearing. Under the circumstances of the case, the Court finds a hearing is not necessary. Johnson indicated that he was ordering a trans
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on defendant Sherman Johnson Jr.'s ("Johnson") Motion for New Trial and Request for Hearing Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Filing No. 146). Although the title of Johnson's motion requests a hearing, nothing in the text of the motion asks for a hearing. Under the circumstances of the case, the Court finds a hearing is not necessary.

Johnson indicated that he was ordering a transcript of the jury voir dire and "reserve[ed] his right to supplement th[e] motion after he received" it. Johnson shall have five days to request the voir dire transcript and fourteen days after receipt of the transcript to file a supplemental brief. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. No hearing will be set for Johnson's Motion for New Trial and Request for Hearing Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Filing No. 146). 2. Johnson will have five days to request the voir dire transcript and fourteen days after receipt of the transcript to file a supplemental brief, and the government will have seven days to respond to Johnson's supplemental brief.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer