Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gordon v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 1:18-cv-00007 (DAD) (JLT). (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190510831 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 09, 2019
Latest Update: May 09, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WITNESS ALYSSA DURAN (Doc. 95) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , District Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT: WHEREAS third party witness, Alyssa Duran, evaded Defendants Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. and Erik Mendoza's ("Defendants") attempts to serve her with a deposition subpoena prior to the February 15, 2019 discovery completion deadline. WHEREAS on February 20, 2019, the Court extended the fact discovery deadline to April 30, 2019, solely to allow Defendants the opportu
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WITNESS ALYSSA DURAN

(Doc. 95)

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

WHEREAS third party witness, Alyssa Duran, evaded Defendants Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. and Erik Mendoza's ("Defendants") attempts to serve her with a deposition subpoena prior to the February 15, 2019 discovery completion deadline.

WHEREAS on February 20, 2019, the Court extended the fact discovery deadline to April 30, 2019, solely to allow Defendants the opportunity to take Duran's deposition. (ECF #80).

WHEREAS after the Court extended the fact discovery deadline to allow Defendants additional time to depose Duran, Defendants continued to make exhaustive and diligent attempts to serve Duran with a deposition subpoena in order to take her deposition.

WHEREAS Duran continued to evade Defendants' attempts to personally serve her with a deposition subpoena.

WHEREAS the Court subsequently granted the Parties' stipulation to serve Duran a deposition subpoena by mail (ECF #83).

WHEREAS Duran was served by mail for a deposition appearance to take place on April 26, 2019.

WHEREAS Duran failed to appear at her deposition on the date set forth in the subpoena on April 26, 2019.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by Plaintiff Paula Gordon, and Defendants, through their respective counsel, as follows:

(1) The fact discovery deadline will remain open indefinitely solely for the parties to take the deposition of Duran before trial.

(2) Should Plaintiff's counsel serve Duran with a trial subpoena before the trial date of January 7, 2020, in the event the Court finds Duran's testimony to be admissible at trial, such trial subpoena must be accompanied by a deposition subpoena for Defendants to take Duran's deposition no later than nine (9) days before the date set forth in the trial subpoena.

(3) Should Plaintiff's counsel serve Duran with a trial subpoena during trial, in the event the Court finds Duran's testimony to be admissible at trial, such trial subpoena must be accompanied by a deposition subpoena for Defendants to take Duran's deposition at least two (2) days before Duran testifies at trial.

(4) Duran shall not testify at trial until Defendants have had the opportunity to depose Duran.

(5) Should Ms. Duran fail to comply with said subpoenas, any party shall have an opportunity to file the appropriate pre-trial motions to seek the appropriate remedies available to the Parties.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer