BUSCHMAN v. ANESTHESIA BUSINESS CONSULTANTS LLC, C13-1787 EMC. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20140905b29
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER (90-Day Conditional Dismissal) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action, and having placed the terms of the settlement with the clients' concurrence on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and that all dates are hereby vacated; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on oppos
Summary: ORDER (90-Day Conditional Dismissal) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action, and having placed the terms of the settlement with the clients' concurrence on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and that all dates are hereby vacated; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposi..
More
ORDER (90-Day Conditional Dismissal)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement of this action, and having placed the terms of the settlement with the clients' concurrence on the record,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and that all dates are hereby vacated; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, with a proof of service of a copy on opposing counsel, within 90 days from the date hereof, that the agreed consideration for the settlement has not been delivered over, this Order shall stand vacated, and the action shall be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
