Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Beltran v. Berryhill, 17-cv-06674-NC. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180119667 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER SCREENING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) Re: Dkt. No. 10 NATHANAEL M. COUSINS , Magistrate Judge . On December 12, 2017, the Court screened plaintiff Eric Beltran's complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and found the complaint failed to state a claim for relief. ECF 9. Beltran filed an amended complaint that added additional facts about the nature of Beltran's alleged impairments and more precisely specified how the administrative law judge allegedl
More

ORDER SCREENING PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

Re: Dkt. No. 10

On December 12, 2017, the Court screened plaintiff Eric Beltran's complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and found the complaint failed to state a claim for relief. ECF 9. Beltran filed an amended complaint that added additional facts about the nature of Beltran's alleged impairments and more precisely specified how the administrative law judge allegedly erred. Again screening under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court finds the amended complaint states a claim for relief. The court clerk is directed to issue the proposed summons at ECF 3 and have the U.S. Marshals serve the defendant with the summons and a copy of the amended complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer