Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HULSEY v. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, 3:13-cv-03355-EMC. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130828921 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULES AND CONTINUING HEARING DATES EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company ("PG&E"), Defendant Landis + Gyr, Inc. ("L+G"), and Defendant Wellington Power Corporation ("Wellington"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, agree as follows: WHEREAS, L+G filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC on July 25, 2013 (Docket #9), which is currently set for hearing on September 26, 2013; WHE
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULES AND CONTINUING HEARING DATES

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Defendant Pacific Gas & Electric Company ("PG&E"), Defendant Landis + Gyr, Inc. ("L+G"), and Defendant Wellington Power Corporation ("Wellington"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, agree as follows:

WHEREAS, L+G filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC on July 25, 2013 (Docket #9), which is currently set for hearing on September 26, 2013;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Remand (Docket #23), which is currently set for hearing on September 26, 2013;

WHEREAS, Wellington filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC and Joinder in L+G's Motion to Dismiss the FAC on August 19, 2013 (Docket #24), which is currently set for hearing on September 26, 2013;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and PG&E have agreed that PG&E shall have until September 17, 2013 to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and PG&E previously agreed, and the Court so ordered, that PG&E shall have until September 20, 2013 to answer or otherwise respond to the FAC (Docket #21);

WHEREAS, PG&E intends to file a Motion to Dismiss the FAC by September 20, 2013;

WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is currently set for October 10, 2013;

WHEREAS, judicial economy and the convenience of the parties are best served by having all three motions to dismiss as well as Plaintiffs' motion to remand heard on the same day;

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among, Plaintiffs, PG&E, Wellington, and L+G, through their respective counsel, and subject to Court approval as follows:

1. L+G's Motion to Dismiss, Wellington's Motion to Dismiss and Joinder in L+G's Motion to Dismiss, and Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand are all continued and shall be heard together on October 31, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.;

2. The opposition(s) to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand will be filed no later than September 17, 2013; Plaintiffs' reply will be filed no later than September 24, 2013;

3. PG&E will file its Motion to Dismiss by September 20, 2013 and will set it for hearing on October 31, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

4. The Case Management Conference will be continued to a date after October 31, 2013 that is convenient for the Court.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference is continued to 12/5/13 with the Case Management Statement due by 11/27/13.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer