Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Garnett v. Care.com, Inc., 2:17-cv-00736-MCE-KJN. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20171213b78 Visitors: 15
Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION (VDRP) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 271(j); AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION [ Removed from Sacramento County Superior Court Civil Case No. 34-2017-00207644 ] MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . WHEREAS the parties have agreed to participate in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP") and neutral, Bruce Kilday, Esq. was selected on October 27, 2017. Pursuant to Local Rule 271(j), the parties are required to hold the
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE VOLUNTARY DISPUTE RESOLUTION (VDRP) PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 271(j); AND ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

[Removed from Sacramento County Superior Court Civil Case No. 34-2017-00207644]

WHEREAS the parties have agreed to participate in the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP") and neutral, Bruce Kilday, Esq. was selected on October 27, 2017. Pursuant to Local Rule 271(j), the parties are required to hold the VDRP session no more than 91 days after the selection of the neutral (by January 26, 2018). The parties were contacted by Mr. Kilday on November 30, 2017 and asked to provide available dates in January 2018 from January 10th onward. The parties met and conferred and agreed to participate in a VDRP session on February 1, 2018. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the deadline within which to hold the VDRP session be extended to February 1, 2018. This is the parties' first request for an extension of time to participate in VDRP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer