BROWN v. NASEER, 2:14-cv-0225 WBS CKD P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150225a34
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 18, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that objections to the findings and recommendations could be filed
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 18, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that objections to the findings and recommendations could be filed...
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 18, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that objections to the findings and recommendations could be filed. The time for filing objections has expired.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 18, 2014 are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's July 1, 2014 request for preliminary injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 16-19) is denied.
Source: Leagle
