Filed: Feb. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO REPLY; DECLARATION OF ROBERT J. STUMPF IN SUPPORT THEREOF JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. STIPULATION Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that: WHEREAS, Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson ("Jackson") filed and served her First Amended Complaint on December 5, 2011; WHEREAS,
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO REPLY; DECLARATION OF ROBERT J. STUMPF IN SUPPORT THEREOF JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. STIPULATION Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that: WHEREAS, Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson ("Jackson") filed and served her First Amended Complaint on December 5, 2011; WHEREAS, ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO REPLY; DECLARATION OF ROBERT J. STUMPF IN SUPPORT THEREOF
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson ("Jackson") filed and served her First Amended Complaint on December 5, 2011;
WHEREAS, Jackson and Defendants William Fischer, Upper Orbit LLC, Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, Marvin Siegel, Mani Koolasuriya, Monvia LLC, Chetan Narsude and New Moon LLC ("Defendants") previously stipulated that Defendants' last day to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint would be January 13, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants requested an additional extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to extend Defendants' time to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to January 27, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff's opposition to the motions to dismiss would be due on or before February 24, 2012;
WHEREAS, Jackson requested an additional extension of time to oppose the motions to dismiss, to March 16, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff's opposition to the motions to dismiss would be due on or before March 16, 2012;
WHEREAS the parties further agreed that Defendants would have an extension of time to file replies on their motions to dismiss, such that they would be due on or before April 9, 2012;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiff shall file and serve her opposition to Defendants' motions to dismiss on or before March 16, 2012, and Defendants shall file and serve their reply papers on or before April 9, 2012.
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Robert J. Stumpf, Jr. hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
