IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING LITIGATION, C 16-05674 WHA (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170209911
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2017
Summary: AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the parties' stipulated request for an extension of time for defendants to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 14). Defendants in this action, Grinder v. Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00343-WHA, are not required to join in the combined motion to dismiss due on February 9, and shall have until 30 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned motion to respond to the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.
AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the parties' stipulated request for an extension of time for defendants to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 14). Defendants in this action, Grinder v. Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00343-WHA, are not required to join in the combined motion to dismiss due on February 9, and shall have until 30 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned motion to respond to the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
