Beyrent v. Berryhill, 2:17-cv-02446-JAD-DJA. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190820f26
Visitors: 28
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF Nos. 22, 25, 29] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff April Beyrent brings this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her request for disability-insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and recommends that I deny Beyrent's motion to remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm that decision. 1 The deadline for o
Summary: Order Adopting Report and Recommendation [ECF Nos. 22, 25, 29] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff April Beyrent brings this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her request for disability-insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and recommends that I deny Beyrent's motion to remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm that decision. 1 The deadline for ob..
More
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation
[ECF Nos. 22, 25, 29]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff April Beyrent brings this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner's denial of her request for disability-insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. The magistrate judge has evaluated the briefing in this case and recommends that I deny Beyrent's motion to remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm that decision.1 The deadline for objections to that recommendation passed without objection or any request to extend the deadline to file one. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 29] is ADOPTED in full;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Remand [ECF No. 22] is DENIED, and the Cross-motion to Affirm [ECF No. 25] is GRANTED;
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 29.
2. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Source: Leagle
