ATHENA FEMININE TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. WILKES, CV-10-4868-SBA. (2012)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20121115775
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. WHEREAS: A. The parties hereto have previously entered into a Stipulation, which the court has entered as an Order on August 28, 2012 (Docket 117), setting deadlines for a Claim Construction Hearing in this action; B. The parties have, in accordance with the Order, disclosed asserted claims and infringement contentions by July 30, 2012, invalidity contentions by September 27, 201
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge. WHEREAS: A. The parties hereto have previously entered into a Stipulation, which the court has entered as an Order on August 28, 2012 (Docket 117), setting deadlines for a Claim Construction Hearing in this action; B. The parties have, in accordance with the Order, disclosed asserted claims and infringement contentions by July 30, 2012, invalidity contentions by September 27, 2012..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING DEADLINES FOR CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING
SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
WHEREAS:
A. The parties hereto have previously entered into a Stipulation, which the court has entered as an Order on August 28, 2012 (Docket 117), setting deadlines for a Claim Construction Hearing in this action;
B. The parties have, in accordance with the Order, disclosed asserted claims and infringement contentions by July 30, 2012, invalidity contentions by September 27, 2012, and listed claim terms to be construed by the court by October 15, 2012;
C. At the same time, the parties have been engaged in continued settlement discussions following an August 24, 2012 Settlement Conference with Honorable Donna Ryu, which discussions are continuing;
D. Prior to or on October 15, 2012, plaintiff listed three claim terms for construction pursuant to claim 1 of its patent, and defendants listed 32 claim terms for construction pursuant to claims 1-21 of plaintiff's patent (approximately 7 of which are repeated within two or more claims); and
E. In order to allow additional time for exchange of proposed construction of identified terms, and the filing of a Joint Claim Construction Statement, and to allow additional time for settlement discussions which may obviate the need for the Claim Construction Hearing:
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, subject to obtaining the permission and consent of the court, through their respective counsel, to extend the current outstanding deadlines in the court's August 28, 2012 Order by a period of approximately twenty-eight (28) days and the Claim Construction Hearing by fourteen (14) days. Accordingly, the parties request the court to extend the deadlines for the parties remaining obligations under the Patent Local Rules as follows:
4. Exchange of Proposed Constructions of Identified Terms (LR4-2)
to be served by: December 3, 2012
5. Joint Claim Construction Statement (LR4-3) to be served by: December 10, 2012
6. Opening Briefs and Evidence to be filed and served by: January 7, 2013
7. Opposition Brief and Evidence to be filed and served by: January 21, 2013
8. Reply Brief to be filed and served by: February 8, 2013
9. Claim Construction Hearing to be held on or after: March 10, 2013
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties shall appear for a claim construction hearing on March 14, 2013 at 10:00 AM. Two (2) hours is allotted for the hearing, inclusive of any tutorial. Immediately following the claims construction hearing, the Court will conduct a Case Management Conference in the courtroom. Prior to the date scheduled for the conference, the parties shall meet and confer and prepare a joint Case Management Conference Statement which complies with the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California and the Standing Orders of this Court. Plaintiff shall assume responsibility for filing the joint statement no less than seven (7) days prior to the conference date. This Order terminates Docket 117.
Source: Leagle
