Filed: Oct. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLAINTIFF'S PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Plaintiff Fujifilm Corporation ("Fujifilm") and Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC ("Motorola") (collectively, the "parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ("Local Patent Rules") re
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLAINTIFF'S PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge. Plaintiff Fujifilm Corporation ("Fujifilm") and Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC ("Motorola") (collectively, the "parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ("Local Patent Rules") req..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL CHARTS FOR PLAINTIFF'S PATENT L.R. 3-1 DISCLOSURES
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Fujifilm Corporation ("Fujifilm") and Defendant Motorola Mobility LLC ("Motorola") (collectively, the "parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Local Rules of Practice for Patent Cases before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ("Local Patent Rules") require a party claiming patent infringement to serve claim charts identifying where the asserted patent claims' limitations are found within the accused instrumentalities (Patent L.R. 3-1(c)) no later than 14 days after the Initial Case Management Conference;
WHEREAS, Fujifilm served its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1, to which claim charts pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1(c) were attached, on February 22, 2013;
WHEREAS, Motorola disputed the sufficiency of Fujifilm's original contentions and Fujifilm disputed the sufficiency of Motorola's initial document productions;
WHEREAS, pursuant to a number of meet and confers between the parties conducted in an effort to resolve the disputes, Fujifilm agreed to amend and supplement its Patent L.R. 3-1 disclosures and Motorola agreed to supplement its document productions.
WHEREAS, the Local Patent Rules provide that amendment of infringement contentions may only be made by order of the Court upon a timely motion (Patent L.R. 3-6);
THEREFOR, pursuant to the parties' agreement, and in an effort to avoid unnecessary motions practice, Fujifilm provided Motorola with amended and supplemental claim charts for Fujifilm's Infringement Contentions on September 26, 2013.
While the parties agreed and hereby stipulate to allow Fujifilm to amend its Patent L.R. 3-1 disclosures without a motion pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-6, nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any rights Motorola may have to object to the sufficiency of Fujifilm's Amended and Supplemental Infringement Contentions and nothing herein shall be deemed to waive any right Fujifilm may have to object to the sufficiency of Motorola's supplemental document productions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
