Filed: Jun. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER AMENDING CIVIL SCHEDULING ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge. It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Docket No. 69) is GRANTED. Section 9 of the Civil Scheduling Order (Docket No. 30, as amended by Docket No. 63) is amended as follows: 9. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE a. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: March 6, 2013 b. Discovery Cut-off: April 17, 2015 c. Dispositive Motion Deadline: The parties agree to the following
Summary: ORDER AMENDING CIVIL SCHEDULING ORDER MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge. It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Docket No. 69) is GRANTED. Section 9 of the Civil Scheduling Order (Docket No. 30, as amended by Docket No. 63) is amended as follows: 9. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE a. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: March 6, 2013 b. Discovery Cut-off: April 17, 2015 c. Dispositive Motion Deadline: The parties agree to the following b..
More
ORDER AMENDING CIVIL SCHEDULING ORDER
MICHAEL J. WATANABE, Magistrate Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Docket No. 69) is GRANTED. Section 9 of the Civil Scheduling Order (Docket No. 30, as amended by Docket No. 63) is amended as follows:
9. CASE PLAN AND SCHEDULE
a. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: March 6, 2013
b. Discovery Cut-off: April 17, 2015
c. Dispositive Motion Deadline:
The parties agree to the following briefing schedules for dispositive motions and motions for class certification:
Dispositive Motion Briefing:
Dispositive Motion Deadline: April 3, 2015
Response due: May 1, 2015
Reply due: May 15, 2015
Class Certification Briefing:
Class Certification Motion Deadline: March 5, 2015
Response due: April 2, 2015
Reply due: April 23, 2015
If a party relies on expert testimony in its class certification briefing, then the opposing party may file a Daubert or Fed. R. Evid. 702 motion challenging such expert testimony within 30 days after the filing of the brief containing such expert testimony. The parties agree that any Daubert or Rule 702 challenges shall be presented such that they may be resolved prior to resolution of any motion for class certification. Any Daubert or Rule 702 motion shall comply with Chief Judge Krieger's Procedures for Rule 702 Motions.
d. Expert Witness Disclosure:
1. The parties shall identify anticipated fields of expert testimony, if any.
Plaintiff anticipates expert testimony in the following fields:
Defendant anticipates potential expert testimony in the following fields: marketing (including but not limited to consumer behavior issues, customer purchase behavior, branding); food labeling; food pricing; food science; science, safety, and benefits of genetically-modified organisms; and economic issues (including but not limited to damages computation and analysis).
2. Limitations which the parties propose on the use or number of expert witnesses.
5 experts per side without leave of court.
3. Plaintiff shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel and any pro se parties with the following information on or before November 21, 2014: identity of the witness, the subject matter on which the witness is expected to present evidence, and a summary of the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify. Any written report required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B) shall be due on or before January 16, 2015.
4. Defendant shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel and any pro se parties with the following information on or before December 19, 2014: identity of the witness, the subject matter on which the witness is expected to present evidence, and a summary of the facts and opinions to which the witness is expected to testify. Any written report required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B) shall be due on or before February 13, 2015.
Notwithstanding the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B), no exception to the requirements of the Rule will be allowed by stipulation unless the stipulation is in writing and approved by the court. In addition to the requirements set forth in Rule 26(a)(2)(B)(I)-(vi), the expert's written report also must identify the principles and methods on which the expert relied in support of his/her opinions and describe how the expert applied those principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case relevant to the opinions set forth in the written report.
e. Identification of Persons to Be Deposed:
Expected
Time of Length of
Name of Deponent Date of Deposition Deposition Deposition
Nicole Van Atta TBD 9:00 am MTN 1 day
time
Any party added by Plaintiff TBD 9:00 am MTN 1 day
time
Any expert(s) disclosed by TBD 9:00 am local 1 day
Plaintiff time
General Mills reserves its right to take additional depositions.
f. Deadline for Interrogatories: January 26, 2015
g. Deadline for Requests for Production of Documents and/or Admissions: January 26, 2015
The remainder of the Civil Scheduling Order (Docket No. 30) entered on February 13, 2013, shall remain in effect.
