Filed: Aug. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR: (1) DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS [Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2] JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties file this Stipulation respectfully requesting a brief enlargement of time for: (1) the filing deadline for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Linksys LLC, (colle
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR: (1) DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND (2) PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS [Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2] JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties file this Stipulation respectfully requesting a brief enlargement of time for: (1) the filing deadline for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Linksys LLC, (collec..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR:
(1) DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND
(2) PLAINTIFFS' REPLY TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS
[Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2]
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 6-2, the parties file this Stipulation respectfully requesting a brief enlargement of time for: (1) the filing deadline for Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Linksys LLC, (collectively, "Cisco") and Hewlett-Packard Co.'s ("HP") Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendants HP and Cisco's Monopolization and Section 17200 Counterclaims and HP's Attempted Monopolization Counterclaim (Dkt. No. 202); and (2) the filing deadline for Plaintiffs ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company LLC's (collectively, "ChriMar") Reply to Defendants' Opposition. This request is supported by good cause and will not affect any other deadlines in this case, as further addressed in the attached Declaration of Brian Paul Gearing.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the parties that, subject to the approval of the Court:
1. The filing deadline for Defendants' Opposition to ChriMar's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 202) shall be extended from August 29, 2014 to September 4, 2014.
2. The filing deadline for ChriMar's Reply to Defendants' Opposition regarding Dkt. No. 202 shall be extended from September 5, 2014 to September 15, 2014.
3. The noticed hearing date and time of September 26, 2014 at 9:00 am for this motion shall not change, and these extensions will not impact any other deadline in the case.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Pursuant to the Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of these documents has been obtained from all parties' counsel.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
1. The filing deadline for Defendants' Opposition to ChriMar's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 202) shall be extended from August 29, 2014 to September 4, 2014.
2. The filing deadline for ChriMar's Reply to Defendants' Opposition regarding Dkt. No. 202 shall be extended from September 5, 2014 to September 15, 2014. The hearing is CONTINUED to October 3, 2014.
