Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Oracle America, Inc. v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, 16-cv-01393-JST. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20161007896 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR ORACLE'S MOTION TO STRIKE HPE'S ANSWER JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . WHEREAS, Defendant Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. ("HPE") filed its Amended Answer to Oracle's First Amended Complaint ("Answer") on September 14, 2016; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation's (collectively, "Oracle") last day to move to strike all or some portion of HPE's Answer is October 11, 2016; WHEREAS, Or
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR ORACLE'S MOTION TO STRIKE HPE'S ANSWER

WHEREAS, Defendant Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Co. ("HPE") filed its Amended Answer to Oracle's First Amended Complaint ("Answer") on September 14, 2016;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation's (collectively, "Oracle") last day to move to strike all or some portion of HPE's Answer is October 11, 2016;

WHEREAS, Oracle and HPE and have agreed to extend Oracle's deadline to move to strike all or some portion of HPE's Answer and the deadline for HPE to oppose Oracle's motion;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and ask the Court to order, as follows:

1. Oracle shall have up to and including October 18, 2016 in which to file a motion to strike all or some portion of HPE's Answer. 2. HPE shall have up to and including November 8, 2016 in which to file its opposition to Oracle's motion. 3. Oracle shall have up to and including November 15, 2016 to file its reply in support of its motion to strike.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ATTESTATION

I, Christopher S. Yates, am counsel for Plaintiffs Oracle America, Inc. and Oracle International Corporation. I am the registered ECF user whose username and password are being used to file this stipulation and proposed order. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the above-identified counsel concurred in this filing.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer