Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FLORES v. VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC, 3:12-cv-05790-LB. (2013)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20130125898 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Phillip Flores and Darah Doung ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Velocity Express, LLC (Defendant) through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and request that the Court order that the initial Case Management Conference be continued to March 1, 2013 or the earliest date thereafter set by the Court. 1. Pursuant to the Court's Order Setting Case Management Confere
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES

CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Phillip Flores and Darah Doung ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Velocity Express, LLC (Defendant) through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to and request that the Court order that the initial Case Management Conference be continued to March 1, 2013 or the earliest date thereafter set by the Court.

1. Pursuant to the Court's Order Setting Case Management Conference, the initial Case Management Conference in this action is set for February 22, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6, 17th floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. Other case management deadlines precede and are set in relation to the Case Management Conference.

2. Counsel currently has a scheduling conflict and will be unable to attend the Case Management Conference set for February 22, 2013. Counsel conferred regarding the conflict and agreed to propose to the Court moving the Case Management Conference one week to accommodate this scheduling conflict.

3. There have been no previous time modifications related to the Case Management Conference or related case management activities in this case.

4. The parties expect that the requested extension of the date for the Case Management Conference will have no adverse effect on the schedule for the case. No trial date or other deadlines have yet been set.

Therefore, Plaintiffs and Defendant, through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. The Case Management Conference date of February 22, 2013 and related deadlines are vacated.

2. The Case Management Conference date is extended to March 1, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. or to the earliest date thereafter set by the Court.

3. Related deadlines for case management activities are extended accordingly.

CHRISTOPHER P. RIDOUT ROBERT G. HULTENG RIDOUT & LYON, LLP LITTLER MENDELSON A Professionl Corporation Attorneys for Defendant TIM BECKER (pro hac pending) VELOCITY EXPRESS, LLC. JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs PHILLIP FLORES, DARAH DOUNG

IT IS ORDERED that the Case Management Conference in this case formerly scheduled for February 22, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. is continued to March 01, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer