Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KROHN v. EQUITY TITLE LLC, 2:14-cv-00620-RFB-PAL. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150717804 Visitors: 25
Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Defendant, Equity Title LLC ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, Holley Driggs Walch Fine Wray Puzey & Thompson, and Plaintiff, Shelley D. Krohn, Chapter 7 Trustee ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record Diamond McCarthy LLP for good cause shown, hereby stipulate and agree that the hearing on the Motion to
More

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendant, Equity Title LLC ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, Holley Driggs Walch Fine Wray Puzey & Thompson, and Plaintiff, Shelley D. Krohn, Chapter 7 Trustee ("Plaintiff"), by and through her counsel of record Diamond McCarthy LLP for good cause shown, hereby stipulate and agree that the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, currently set for July 1, 2015, be continued to the first available Court hearing date after July 23, 2015. This is the parties' first request for an extension.

Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2014 (Dkt. No. 14).

Plaintiff filed her Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on June 9, 2014 (Dkt. No. 18).

Defendant filed its Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss on June 17, 2014 (Dkt. No. 20).

Plaintiff filed a Sur-Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on June 19, 2014 (Dkt. No. 22).

On July 24, 2015, the Court issued a Minute Order setting the hearing and oral argument on the Motion to Dismiss for July 1, 2015.

There exists good cause to grant this extension to hear the Motion for the following reasons:

1. An alleged conflict has arisen in this case and Defendant requires additional time before the hearing to resolve this conflict.

2. Plaintiff's counsel will be out of the country from July 4, 2015 through July 23, 2015.

Therefore, Defendant and Plaintiff so stipulate that the hearing in on the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction be continued to a date after July 23, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer