U.S. v. MIRABETE-PENA, 1:12-CR-00130-AWI. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20121130662
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 28, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE-SCHEDULING TRIAL DATE, TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND MOTION IN LIMINE HEARINGS ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the commencement of trial now set for February 26, 2013, may be continued to March 26, 2013, and that the trial confirmation and motion in limine hearings scheduled for February 4, 2013 pursuant to the Amended Pretrial Order entered in this ca
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE-SCHEDULING TRIAL DATE, TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND MOTION IN LIMINE HEARINGS ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the commencement of trial now set for February 26, 2013, may be continued to March 26, 2013, and that the trial confirmation and motion in limine hearings scheduled for February 4, 2013 pursuant to the Amended Pretrial Order entered in this cas..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE-SCHEDULING TRIAL DATE, TRIAL CONFIRMATION AND MOTION IN LIMINE HEARINGS
ANTHONY W. ISHII, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, and through their respective attorneys of record herein, that the commencement of trial now set for February 26, 2013, may be continued to March 26, 2013, and that the trial confirmation and motion in limine hearings scheduled for February 4, 2013 pursuant to the Amended Pretrial Order entered in this case (see Docket no. 74) may be continued to March 11, 2013.
The reason for the continuance and rescheduling of trial dates is to allow for further plea negotiations and because the attorney for plaintiff United States of America is scheduled to commence a separate trial in close proximity to trial in this case that is expected to be on-going on February 26, 2013. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and that the delay from the continuance shall be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The stipulated modified trial schedule is approved. The intervening period of delay shall be excluded in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
