Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CAMPBELL v. PARAMO, 2:15-CV-1986-KJM-GGH. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160517810 Visitors: 6
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND PROPOSED ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS , Magistrate Judge . Petitioner Kirk Edward Campbell, through counsel, hereby moves for an extension of time to June 23, 2016 in which to file his reply brief (traverse) to the Respondent's Answer. The reason for this request is that counsel needs additional time in which to research and prepare the Reply Brief and counsel's schedule in other cases, including a 2-week jury t
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF TO RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND PROPOSED ORDER

Petitioner Kirk Edward Campbell, through counsel, hereby moves for an extension of time to June 23, 2016 in which to file his reply brief (traverse) to the Respondent's Answer. The reason for this request is that counsel needs additional time in which to research and prepare the Reply Brief and counsel's schedule in other cases, including a 2-week jury trial starting on May 31, 2016, in United States v. Martin, No. 2:15-CR-0235-TLN.

Deputy Attorney General Doris Calandra does not oppose this motion.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer