Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Miccio v. Miranda, 2:17-cv-0932 KJM CKD P. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190319868 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2019
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . By order filed January 30, 2019, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed January 30, 2019, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer