Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. U.S., 2:16-cv-02897-JAM-AC. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180705879 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2018
Summary: CONSENT DECREE JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, the Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC"), filed its Complaint for Recovery of Response Costs and Declaratory Relief ("Complaint") on December 9, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the "Court"), pursuant to sections 107(a) and 113(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. 9607(a) and 9613(g). This Co
More

CONSENT DECREE

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff, the Department of Toxic Substances Control ("DTSC"), filed its Complaint for Recovery of Response Costs and Declaratory Relief ("Complaint") on December 9, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the "Court"), pursuant to sections 107(a) and 113(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607(a) and 9613(g). This Consent Decree embodies the settlement reached between DTSC and the Defendant, the United States of America (the "United States," on behalf of "Settling Federal Agencies").

The Court, after review of the proposed settlement and consent decree and with the consent of DTSC and the United States, hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS

1.1 All terms used in this Consent Decree that are defined in section 101 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, shall have the same meaning as set forth in that section.

1.2 "DTSC" shall mean DTSC, its predecessors including, but not limited to the Toxic Substances Control Program of the State of California Department of Health Services, and its successors.

1.3 "Effective Date" is the day on which this Consent Decree is entered as an order of the Court.

1.4 "Matters Addressed" by this Consent Decree are defined as any and all civil liability of the Settling Federal Agencies, pursuant to CERCLA, or any other statute, regulation, or common law theory for reimbursement of all or any portion of response costs, past or future, incurred or to be incurred by DTSC, or by any other entity that is not a party to this Consent Decree, in response to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances occurring at, in, or from the Site prior to the signature of this Consent Decree by the United States. Matters Addressed does not include any matters identified in Section 7, Reservation of Rights, of this Consent Decree.

1.5 "Response Costs" shall include all costs of "removal," "remedial action," or "response", incurred or to be incurred by DTSC, or by any third person or entity not a party to this Consent Decree that incurred costs pursuant to state administrative orders related to this Site, in response to the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at, in, or from the Site. Said term shall include, but not be limited to, direct labor costs; contractor, consultant and expert costs; travel and any other out-of-pocket expenses; the costs of identifying, developing evidence against, and pursuing claims against persons or entities, alleged to be liable for the release or threatened release of hazardous substances at, in, or from the Site; indirect costs; and oversight costs.

1.6. "Settling Federal Agencies" means the Department of Defense, the Department of the Army, the United States Army Corps of Engineers ("USACE"), and the General Services Administration.

1.7 "Site" means the properties known as 711 and 750 Jackson Street, Benicia, Solano County, California (identified by Assessor's Parcel number 0080-14-0440) and 938, 940, 942, 945, 946, 952, and 954 Tyler Street; 963, 965, 967, 969, 971, 973, 977, 979, 981, 983, 985, 989, and 991 Lincoln Street; and 900 and 954 Jackson Street, Benicia, Solano County, California (identified by Assessor's Parcel numbers 0080-28-0010, 0080-28-0030, 0080-28-0040, 0080-28-0050) and all locations where hazardous substances released at, in, or from those addresses may come to be located in the future.

2. RECITALS

2.1 DTSC is the California state agency with primary jurisdiction over the response to the release and threatened release of hazardous substances at, in, or from the Site.

2.2 By and through its Complaint, DTSC seeks to recover jointly and severally from the United States all costs it has incurred in response to releases and/or threatened releases of hazardous substances at, in, or from the Site, pursuant to section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a). DTSC also seeks a declaratory judgment that the United States is jointly and severally liable for all additional costs incurred by DTSC in response to the releases and/or threatened releases of hazardous substances at, in, or from the Site pursuant to section 113(g)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(g)(2).

2.3 In its Complaint, DTSC alleges, inter alia, that: the United States owned and operated the Site as part of the larger former Benicia Arsenal ("Arsenal") from 1849 until 1965 and conducted a variety of operations that released hazardous substances, including, but not limited to, lead and trichloroethylene and its breakdown products, including cis-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride, into the environment.

2.4 The Arsenal, located in Solano County, California, consisted of approximately 2,728.4 acres that was acquired by the United States between 1849 and 1958 for the purpose of maintaining a military installation. The Arsenal served as the principal depot for ordnance, issuance (supplies, ammunition, small arms parts, and accessories), the testing of small arms, mobile and seacoast artillery targets, and vehicle maintenance for the Division of the Pacific.

2.5 The United States represents the following: the Arsenal was continuously occupied by the military from its establishment in 1849 to its closure in 1964. The United States' deactivation and closure of the Arsenal was completed in 1964. The former Arsenal, with the exception of 1.33 acres of cemetery retained by the United States, was conveyed by Quit Claim deeds to the City of Benicia, which subsequently conveyed most of the former Arsenal to Benicia Industries to develop an industrial business park. Areas within the former Arsenal have been developed with residences, industry and commercial business operations, and a portion is operated as a deep water port.

2.6 The United States represents the following: beginning in the 1990s, the USACE, Sacramento District, conducted research and investigations under the Defense Environmental Restoration Program for Formerly Used Defense Sites, ("DERP-FUDS") to identify chemicals used in historic military operations of the Arsenal and produced a Records Research Report and Preliminary Assessment that distinguished locations within the former Arsenal requiring no further action ("NDAI") from those requiring more investigation. The USACE shared the results of the investigations with DTSC.

2.7 The United States represents the following: USACE subsurface investigations determined that trichloroethene (TCE) and its degradation products (cis-1,2-dichloroethene, trans-1,2-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride), polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), petroleum hydrocarbons, and lead were contaminants of interest in soil and groundwater in portions of an area that had been historically and is currently used as an industrial area, designated Area I. As part of its DERP-FUDS investigation, the USACE determined that post-Army beneficial uses, including aluminum wheel manufacturing, ironworks and welding activities, and transmission repair facilities, among other uses, on the property potentially contributed to the TCE, petroleum hydrocarbon (including MTBE1), lead and other known contamination at the Site.

2.8 The Site that is the subject of this litigation consists of several building complexes and land located in the designated Area I (industrial) portion of the former Arsenal.

2.9 In 2014, DTSC issued Imminent and Substantial Endangerment Orders ("ISE Orders"), as amended, to current and former owners and operators at the Site.

2.10 On or about December 9, 2016, DTSC initiated the above-captioned case, seeking cost recovery and declaratory relief under CERCLA sections 107(a) and 113(g), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and 9613.

2.11 Unless expressly stated otherwise, DTSC and the United States represent and acknowledge that, in deciding whether to enter this Consent Decree, they have not relied on any statement of fact, statement of opinion, or representation, express or implied, made by any other party to this Consent Decree other than the investigatory reports known to DTSC and the Settling Federal Agencies and DTSC's estimate of past and future costs for this Site. DTSC and the United States have investigated the subject matter of this Consent Decree to the extent necessary to make a rational and informed decision to execute it and each has had the opportunity to consult with independent counsel.

2.12 DTSC and the United States agree that settlement without further litigation and without the admission or adjudication of any issue of fact or law is the most appropriate means of resolving this action. This Consent Decree was negotiated and executed by DTSC and the United States in good faith to avoid prolonged litigation. DTSC and the United States, moreover, have negotiated this Consent Decree to further the public interest and to protect human health and the environment.

3. JURISDICTION

This Court has jurisdiction over this action and over the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C. § 9613(b). Venue is proper in the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 42 U.S.C § 9613(b). Further, this Court has the authority to enter this Consent Decree as a decree of the Court.

4. SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTED CLAIMS

4.1 This Consent Decree represents a fair, reasonable, and equitable settlement of the matters addressed herein.

4.2 For the purposes of this Consent Decree, the United States admits none of the allegations of the Complaint. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed as an admission of any issue of law or fact or of any violation of law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the United States acknowledges its responsibility pursuant to Paragraphs 5, 8, 10.2, and 18 of this Consent Decree and shall not deny such responsibility in any proceeding brought by DTSC to enforce this Consent Decree.

4.3 Except as set forth in Section 8 of this Consent Decree, nothing in this Consent Decree shall prejudice, waive, or impair any right, remedy, or defense that the United States may have in any other or further legal proceeding.

4.4 In an effort to resolve past and future costs, DTSC provided to the United States a summary of past costs. DTSC and the United States negotiated about the amount of the past costs and agreed to a total of $595,100.54 through April 2017. For future costs, DTSC used the Remedial Action Cost Engineering and Requirements ("RACER") software, which was developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") for estimating future response costs, and made a bona fide estimate that the potential future costs associated with the response actions needed to adequately address the known hazardous substances released at the Site would total $5,951,477.00. The total of DTSC's agreed to past costs and estimated future costs for the Site are $6,546,577.54.

4.5 In order to avoid protracted litigation, including third-party claims identified by the United States, and to allow response actions to commence without any further delay, DTSC and the United States agreed, pursuant to the terms contained herein, the United States will pay, on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies, eighty-four percent (84%) of the agreed upon past and estimated future costs as a one-time payment. That settlement amount is $5,499,125.13. In addition, in order to ensure that the funding can adequately address the potential for future cost overruns and to obtain full contribution protection, the United States has agreed to pay a fifteen percent (15%) premium on the estimated future costs resulting in an additional premium payment of $892,721.55. Under this Consent Decree, the total settlement amount to be paid by the United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies associated with the former Arsenal, to DTSC is $6,391,846.68.

5. PAYMENTS BY THE UNITED STATES

5.1 As soon as reasonably possible after the Effective Date, the United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies, shall pay to DTSC the sum of $6,391,846.68. The payment to DTSC shall be made on or within sixty (60) days from the Effective Date of this Agreement. If the United States on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies does not pay this amount in full on or within sixty (60) days from the Effective Date, then interest shall begin to accrue on the unpaid balance. Interest shall accrue at the rate specified for interest on investments of the Hazardous Substance Superfund established under subchapter A of chapter 98 of Title 26 of the United States Code, commencing on the 61st day after the Effective Date and accruing through the date of the payment.

5.2 The payments described in Section 5.1 will be made by electronic fund transfer. Copies of all payments or notices of electronic payments shall be sent to:

Charlie Ridenour Branch Chief, Cleanup Program — Sacramento Office Department of Toxic Substances Control 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95826 Charlie.Ridenour@dtsc.ca.gov Rose B. Fua Deputy Attorney General California Department of Justice 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor P.O. Box 70550 Oakland, CA 94612-0550 Rose.Fua@doj.ca.gov

5.3 DTSC and the United States recognize and acknowledge that the payment obligations of the United States on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies under this Consent Decree can only be paid from appropriated funds legally available for such purpose. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be interpreted or construed as a commitment or requirement that the United States obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or any other applicable provision of law.

6. COVENANT NOT TO SUE BY DTSC

Except as specifically provided for in Section 7 below, and except as may be necessary to enforce the terms of this Consent Decree, as of the Effective Date, DTSC covenants not to sue the Settling Federal Agencies for the Matters Addressed by this Consent Decree.

7. RESERVATION OF RIGHTS

7.1 The Covenant Not to Sue set forth in Section 6 above does not pertain to any matters other than those expressly specified therein. DTSC reserves, and this Consent Decree is without prejudice to all rights and claims of DTSC against the Settling Federal Agencies and any other person with respect to all other matters, including, but not limited to, the following:

(a) Failure of the United States to meet its obligations under Paragraphs 5, 8, 10.2, and 18 of this Consent Decree; (b) Damage to natural resources, as defined in section 101(6) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(6), including all costs incurred by any natural resources trustees; (c) Liability resulting from the United States' introduction of any hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant to the Site after the signature of this Consent Decree by the United States; (d) Liability resulting from acts by the United States after the signature of this Consent Decree by the United States that cause the exacerbation of the hazardous substance conditions existing at or from the Site; (e) Liability based on the ownership or operation of the Site by the United States when such ownership or operation commences after the signature of this Consent Decree by the United States; (f) Liability arising from the past, present, or future disposal of hazardous substances at sites or locations other than the Site; and (g) Criminal liability.

7.2. Except as expressly provided in this Consent Decree, nothing in this Consent Decree is intended to nor shall it be construed to preclude DTSC from exercising its existing authority under any law, statute, or regulation, and nothing in this Consent Decree is intended, nor shall it be construed, to preclude any other state agency, department, board, or entity or any federal entity, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency or a federal natural resource trustee, from exercising its authority under any law, statute, or regulation.

7.3. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Consent Decree, DTSC reserves the right to institute proceedings in this action or in a new action against the United States seeking any remedy allowed by law, if: conditions previously unknown to DTSC, for which the United States is potentially liable under any statute or law, are discovered at the Site after the Effective Date and these conditions indicate that (1) a previously unknown hazardous substance has been or is being released at the Site, there is a threat of such release into the environment, or previously unknown ordnance or radiological material are discovered at the Site and (2) the response performed at the Site is not protective of human health and the environment.

8. COVENANT NOT TO SUE BY THE UNITED STATES ON BEHALF OF THE SETTLING FEDERAL AGENCIES

The United States on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies covenants not to sue, and agrees not to assert any claims or causes of action against, DTSC, or its contractors, employees, or attorneys for any costs or damages the Settling Federal Agencies might incur or for any injuries or losses the Settling Federal Agencies might suffer as a result of their obligations under this Consent Decree. The United States on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies further covenants not to sue, and agrees not to assert any claims or causes of action against, DTSC, or its contractors, employees, or attorneys, for any and all civil liability for reimbursement of all or any portion of the Settling Federal Agencies' response costs, past or future, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, or any other relief under CERCLA with regard to releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances at, in, or from the Site.

9. EFFECT OF THE CONSENT DECREE

9.1 This Consent Decree constitutes the resolution of the Settling Federal Agencies' alleged liability with respect to the Matters Addressed in a judicially approved settlement within the meaning of section 113(f)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(2).

9.2 Accordingly, upon entry of this Consent Decree as a consent decree of the Court, and provided that the United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies, performs all of its obligations under this Consent Decree, the Settling Federal Agencies shall be entitled, as of the Effective Date, to protection against all claims for contribution, pursuant to section 113(f)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(2), for the Matters Addressed by this Consent Decree, to the fullest extent of the law.

9.3 Except as specifically provided in this Consent Decree, nothing in this Consent Decree is intended, nor shall be construed, to waive, release, or otherwise affect any right, claim, or cause of action held by any party to this Consent Decree against, or to provide a covenant not to sue to, any third person not a party to this Consent Decree, or to in any way limit, restrict, or impair the right of any party to this Consent Decree to assert rights, claims, causes of action, and defenses against any third person not a party to this Consent Decree, including without limitation, the right to seek payment, reimbursement, contribution, or indemnity from such persons for obligations incurred or to be incurred, or actions taken or to be taken, under this Consent Decree. Except as specifically provided in this Consent Decree, DTSC and the United States expressly reserve any rights, claims, or causes of action they might have against any third persons not a party to this Consent Decree.

9.4 This Consent Decree is contingent and dependent on all of its terms being approved and entered by the Court. If the Court does not approve and enter this Consent Decree, DTSC and the United States reserve all their respective rights, remedies, and defenses.

9.5 This Consent Decree is not intended, nor shall it be construed, to limit or otherwise affect DTSC's right to select a response action for the Site.

10. NOTIFICATION

10.1 Notification to or communication between DTSC and the United States as required or provided for in this Consent Decree shall be addressed as follows:

As to DTSC: Charlie Ridenour Branch Chief, Cleanup Program — Sacramento Office Department of Toxic Substances Control 8800 Cal Center Drive Sacramento, CA 95826 Rose B. Fua Deputy Attorney General California Department of Justice 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor P.O. Box 70550 Oakland, CA 94612-0550 As to the United States: Letitia J. Grishaw, Chief, Environmental Defense Section United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Mark A. Rigau Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice 301 Howard Street, Suite 1050 San Francisco, CA 94105

10.2 Upon 10 days written notice to the other party, a party to this Consent Decree may substitute another person for an addressee named above to receive notifications or communications as required or provided for in this Consent Decree.

11. MODIFICATION OF THE CONSENT DECREE

The Consent Decree may only be modified upon the written agreement of DTSC and the United States and the approval of the Court or, following entry of this Consent Decree, upon order of the Court after noticed motion by a party to this Consent Decree.

12. APPLICATION OF THE CONSENT DECREE

This Consent Decree shall apply to and be binding upon DTSC, the United States and Settling Federal Agencies, and each of their respective successors and assigns. The provisions of this Consent Decree shall inure to the benefit of DTSC, the United States and Settling Federal Agencies, and each of their respective successors and assigns.

13. INTEGRATION

This Consent Decree, including any exhibits and materials incorporated herein by reference, constitutes the entire agreement between DTSC and the United States, on behalf of the Settling Federal Agencies, and may not be amended or supplemented except as provided for in this Consent Decree.

14. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION

The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purpose of interpreting and enforcing the terms of this Consent Decree.

15. EXECUTION OF DECREE

This Consent Decree may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

16. INTERPRETATION

This Consent Decree shall be deemed to have been drafted equally and by all parties hereto.

17. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS

Except as provided in paragraph 18, as to each other, DTSC and the United States on behalf of Settling Federal Agencies, shall bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and all other costs of litigation. This paragraph shall have no effect on the rights of DTSC, the United States, or the Settling Federal Agencies to recover these fees or costs from any other party.

18. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE CONSENT DECREE

If DTSC must bring an action to enforce this Consent Decree, the United States, on behalf of Settling Federal Agencies, shall reimburse DTSC for all costs of such action, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees.

19. APPROVAL OF PARTIES

DTSC and the United States consent to this Consent Decree by their authorized representatives.

20. ENTRY OF THE CONSENT DECREE

This Consent Decree shall be signed and lodged with the Court for a period of not less than sixty (60) calendar days for public notice and comment. DTSC shall file with the Court any written comments received and DTSC's responses thereto. DTSC may withdraw its consent to this Consent Decree if comments received during the public comment period disclose facts or considerations that DTSC believes indicate this Consent Decree is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The United States consents to the entry of this Consent Decree without further notice.

21. AUTHORITY TO ENTER

Each signatory to this Consent Decree certifies that he or she is fully authorized by the party he or she represents to enter into this Consent Decree, to execute it on behalf of the party represented, and legally to bind that party.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. MTBE, methyl tert-butyl ether, is a gasoline additive that was first used in the United States in 1979 as an octane enhancer. See, e.g., https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/mtbe.html. Thus, the United States contends that MTBE contamination could not have occurred during the Army's occupation of the Benicia Arsenal, which ended in 1964.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer