CARMONA v. D'ALESSANDRO, 2:10-cv-0898 KJM KJN P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140606a50
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2014
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On March 31, 2014, this court denied defendant's motion to dismiss and directed this action to proceed on plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18), against sole defendant D'Alessandro. ( See ECF Nos. 38, 39.) Defendant D'Alessandro has not yet filed an answer to the Second Amended Complaint. 1 After an answer has been filed, the court will issue a Discovery and Scheduling Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 21 days after
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. On March 31, 2014, this court denied defendant's motion to dismiss and directed this action to proceed on plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18), against sole defendant D'Alessandro. ( See ECF Nos. 38, 39.) Defendant D'Alessandro has not yet filed an answer to the Second Amended Complaint. 1 After an answer has been filed, the court will issue a Discovery and Scheduling Order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 21 days after t..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
On March 31, 2014, this court denied defendant's motion to dismiss and directed this action to proceed on plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 18), against sole defendant D'Alessandro. (See ECF Nos. 38, 39.) Defendant D'Alessandro has not yet filed an answer to the Second Amended Complaint.1 After an answer has been filed, the court will issue a Discovery and Scheduling Order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, defendant D'Alessandro shall file an answer to the Second Amended Complaint.
FootNotes
1. The only responsive pleading filed by defendant D'Alessandro was his motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 27.)
Source: Leagle