Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

P.R. ex rel. Rice v. Fresno Unified School District, 1:19-cv-00220-DAD-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190313780 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM (Doc. No. 2) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . On March 10, 2019, Katie Price filed a petition to be appointed guardian ad litem for plaintiff P.R. for purposes of this action. (Doc. No. 2.) "District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), to safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors." Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177 , 1181 (9th Cir. 2011). Rule 17 provides that "[t]he court must appoint a guar
More

ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM (Doc. No. 2)

On March 10, 2019, Katie Price filed a petition to be appointed guardian ad litem for plaintiff P.R. for purposes of this action. (Doc. No. 2.)

"District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), to safeguard the interests of litigants who are minors." Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1181 (9th Cir. 2011). Rule 17 provides that "[t]he court must appoint a guardian ad litem—or issue another appropriate order—to protect a minor or incompetent person who is unrepresented in an action." Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). Local Rule 202(a) of this court further states, in pertinent part:

Upon commencement of an action or upon initial appearance in defense of an action by or on behalf of a minor . . . the attorney representing the minor or incompetent person shall present . . . a motion for the appointment of a guardian ad litem by the Court, or . . . a showing satisfactory to the Court that no such appointment is necessary to ensure adequate representation of the minor or incompetent person. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c).

The decision to appoint a guardian ad litem "must normally be left to the sound discretion of the trial court." United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, 795 F.2d 796, 804 (9th Cir. 1986).

Katie Price petitions the court to appoint her as guardian ad litem to her child, plaintiff P.R., a minor child under the age of eighteen. Petitioner states that she is the mother and primary caretaker of plaintiff P.R., that she has no interests adverse to those of plaintiff P.R., and that she is competent and qualified to protect the interests of plaintiff P.R. Finding good cause, the court grants the petition (Doc. No. 2) and appoints Katie Price guardian ad litem of P.R., a minor and plaintiff in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer