Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CONLEY, 2:12-CR-0077 JAM. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130205b61 Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION CONCERNING HANDLING OF CERTAIN WITNESS STATEMENTS; ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. At the request of defense counsel, the government is preparing to distribute some advance Jencks material consisting of a grand jury transcript and/or other material containing witness statements. The government believes that if this material were to be circulated it would potentially put the witness at risk of being injured, or at least threatened to be injured, by other persons who either wan
More

STIPULATION CONCERNING HANDLING OF CERTAIN WITNESS STATEMENTS; ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

At the request of defense counsel, the government is preparing to distribute some advance Jencks material consisting of a grand jury transcript and/or other material containing witness statements. The government believes that if this material were to be circulated it would potentially put the witness at risk of being injured, or at least threatened to be injured, by other persons who either want to discourage the particular witness from testifying at trial or who are generally opposed to anyone cooperating with law enforcement authorities.

Counsel for the defendant, T. Louis Palazzo, Esq., and counsel for the government have had discussions about this potential issue. They have agreed that as to all witness statements provided to the defense by the government after the date of this stipulation, that the defense will not allow the defendant or any other persons to have copy or access to this material outside the presence of Mr. Pallazzo. Further, Mr. Pallazzo shall not allow the material, or copies thereof, to be shown or given to, any other person with the exception of persons employed by or otherwise directly associated with the Palazzo Law Firm, including any defense investigator(s), in performance of their duties in this case. This does not prohibit defense counsel from allowing the defendant to simply read the witness statements under the supervision of defense counsel or persons employed by the Palazzo law firm. Finally, this agreement binds not only Mr. Palazzo, his staff and his investigators, but any other attorney that represents the defendant in the future in this case (whether substituted in the present criminal case, or on appeal, or in collateral attack of any conviction). To that end, Mr. Palazzo agrees to have any new defense counsel sign a copy of this stipulation verifying both the receipt of this stipulation and an agreement to be bound by its content, prior to forwarding the Jencks material to new counsel, Therefore, it is requested that the Court approve this stipulation and enter it as a Protective Order by signing below.

ORDER

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer