WILLIAMS v. MILLER, 2:11-CV-01844-GEB-DAD. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130207853
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. In order to facilitate continuing discovery and evaluation of the case, Plaintiff DIANA WILLIAMS and Defendants YOLO DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES and PAMELA MILLER hereby stipulate and seek an order of the Court modifying the Court's October 6, 2011 scheduling order and subsequent July 5, 2012 order as follows: 1. All parties agree to comp
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge. In order to facilitate continuing discovery and evaluation of the case, Plaintiff DIANA WILLIAMS and Defendants YOLO DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES and PAMELA MILLER hereby stipulate and seek an order of the Court modifying the Court's October 6, 2011 scheduling order and subsequent July 5, 2012 order as follows: 1. All parties agree to compl..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES
GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.
In order to facilitate continuing discovery and evaluation of the case, Plaintiff DIANA WILLIAMS and Defendants YOLO DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES and PAMELA MILLER hereby stipulate and seek an order of the Court modifying the Court's October 6, 2011 scheduling order and subsequent July 5, 2012 order as follows:
1. All parties agree to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or before March 4, 2013, with any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) to be disclosed on or before April 4, 2013.
2. All other dates previously ordered by the Court in the October 6, 2011 scheduling order and subsequent orders are to remain unmodified, altered, or changed.
This Stipulation may be executed in counterpart and faxed and/or authorized electronic signature shall be deemed the original as an original execution.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. All parties will comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) and (C)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or before March 4, 2013, with any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(D)(ii) to be disclosed on or before April 4, 2013.
2. All other dates previously ordered by the Court in the October 6, 2011 scheduling order and subsequent orders are to remain unmodified, altered, or changed.
Source: Leagle
