Denegal v. Farrell, 1:15-cv-01251 DAD JLT PC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190117e92
Visitors: 29
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 82) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted a two-week extension of time, to and including February 4, 2019, within which to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS SO ORDERED.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO THE RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS
(Doc. 82)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
Good cause having been shown, Defendants are granted a two-week extension of time, to and including February 4, 2019, within which to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
