Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lou v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., 3:17-cv-04157-WHO. (2018)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20180322b85 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Re: Dkt. No. 43 WILLIAM H. ORRICK , District Judge . I previously dismissed all claims against defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. ("Chase") and dismissed it from this case. Order Granting Chase's Mot. to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 42). Chase now moves for entry of final judgment. 1 Dkt. No. 43. This matter is suitable without oral argument, and the hearing scheduled for April 4, 2018 is VACATED. Civil L. R. 7-1(b). Because I dismissed the claims agai
More

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.

Re: Dkt. No. 43

I previously dismissed all claims against defendant JPMorgan Chase, N.A. ("Chase") and dismissed it from this case. Order Granting Chase's Mot. to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 42). Chase now moves for entry of final judgment.1 Dkt. No. 43. This matter is suitable without oral argument, and the hearing scheduled for April 4, 2018 is VACATED. Civil L. R. 7-1(b).

Because I dismissed the claims against Chase with prejudice, I see "no just reason for delay" regarding entry of final judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Chase and against plaintiff. Each party to bear its own fees and costs, as requested by Chase. Dkt. No. 43-1, p.2.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to this motion.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer