STIPULATED MOTION TO REVISE SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT REPLY BRIEF AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this action on August 1, 2018, ECF No. 1, and this Court entered an order setting the initial case management conference and alternative dispute resolution deadlines. ECF No. 8. Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on September 6, 2018, ECF No. 15, and on September 20, Defendants counsel appeared in the case and Defendants filed their Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 18. This case was re-assigned to Judge Gillam on September 21, 2018. ECF No. 20.

Under the schedule in the Local Rules, 7-2 and 7-3, Plaintiffs' reply brief is due September 27, 2018. However, due to uncontrollable conflicts in Plaintiffs' counsel's schedule, the Plaintiffs have requested and the Defendants have stipulated to a modest seven-day extension to that deadline, to October 4, 2018. There have not been any previous time modifications in this case, either by stipulation or by Court order, and the requested extension will not affect any other dates.

This Motion does not prejudice any party. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request a seven-day revision to the schedule.

[PROPOSED] ORDER REVISING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFFS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT REPLY BRIEF

This matter comes before the Court on the parties' "Stipulated Motion to Revise Schedule for Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment Reply Brief," filed in 18-cv-4633-HSG. The request is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is due October 4, 2018.