Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RODMAN v. SAFEWAY INC., 3:11-CV-03003 JST (JCS). (2015)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20150508a88 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 07, 2015
Latest Update: May 07, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR IMMEDIATE APPEAL AMENDED ORDER RE PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff, Michael Rodman ("Plaintiff") and Defendant, Safeway Inc. ("Safeway"), hereby stipulate as follows: 1. WHEREAS, the hearing on Safeway's Motion to Certify for Immediate Appeal Amended Order Granting Partial Summary Judgement to Plaintiff ("Motion") is currently scheduled for May 21, 2015 (Dk
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE FOR MOTION TO CERTIFY FOR IMMEDIATE APPEAL AMENDED ORDER RE PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

STIPULATION

Plaintiff, Michael Rodman ("Plaintiff") and Defendant, Safeway Inc. ("Safeway"), hereby stipulate as follows:

1. WHEREAS, the hearing on Safeway's Motion to Certify for Immediate Appeal Amended Order Granting Partial Summary Judgement to Plaintiff ("Motion") is currently scheduled for May 21, 2015 (Dkt. No. 251);

2. WHEREAS, the Motion is now fully briefed (Dkt. Nos. 251, 253, 256);

3. WHEREAS, the Motion was not anticipated and accounted for in connection the current schedule agreed to by the parties at the January 28, 2015 Case Management Conference and the Stipulated Order Amending Case Schedule (Dkt. No. 246) dated March 24, 2015;

4. WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff has pre-existing professional and personal obligations necessitating a modest continuance of the May 21, 2015 hearing date;

5. WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiff and Safeway have met and conferred regarding a continued hearing date and have agreed to a new hearing date of June 4, 2015;

NOW, THEREFORE, subject to the Court's approval, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the undersigned that:

1. The hearing on the Motion currently scheduled for May 21, 2015 is continued to June 4, 2015.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

PROPOSED ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore, PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer