United States v. Fuller, 19-CR-00141 KJM. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20200115d90
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , Chief District Judge . On December 17, 2019 the Court, having heard the arguments of counsel and considered the briefs submitted in this matter, ordered a competency evaluation and designated an expert for this evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4241(b). Pursuant to the statute and The Guide To Judiciary Policy, Vol.7A, Chap.3, the Court directs the government, through the Department of Justice (DOJ) to appropriate reasonable funds for the evaluation forthwit
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER , Chief District Judge . On December 17, 2019 the Court, having heard the arguments of counsel and considered the briefs submitted in this matter, ordered a competency evaluation and designated an expert for this evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4241(b). Pursuant to the statute and The Guide To Judiciary Policy, Vol.7A, Chap.3, the Court directs the government, through the Department of Justice (DOJ) to appropriate reasonable funds for the evaluation forthwith..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, Chief District Judge.
On December 17, 2019 the Court, having heard the arguments of counsel and considered the briefs submitted in this matter, ordered a competency evaluation and designated an expert for this evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241(b).
Pursuant to the statute and The Guide To Judiciary Policy, Vol.7A, Chap.3, the Court directs the government, through the Department of Justice (DOJ) to appropriate reasonable funds for the evaluation forthwith so that the evaluation can proceed in a timely fashion.
The Court excludes time based on 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A) (Local Code A — examinations to determine the mental competency of the defendant) from the date of the entry of this order through the conclusion of the competency evaluation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle