Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HOLLIS v. GORBY, 2:09-cv-1627 JAM CKD P. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20120727740 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. On June 12, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's June 6, 2012 order granting defendants $2,058.19 in costs and fees associated with their bringing a motion to compel plaintiff to be deposed which was granted. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the ma
More

ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

On June 12, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's June 6, 2012 order granting defendants $2,058.19 in costs and fees associated with their bringing a motion to compel plaintiff to be deposed which was granted. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed June 6, 2012, is affirmed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer