Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bradley v. Kernan, 2:18-cv-02994-TLN-AC (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190715629 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2019
Summary: RELATED CASE ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . On June 14, 2019, Plaintiff Taryn Bradley-Aboyade filed a Notice of Related Case in which counsel indicates the above-entitled civil actions are related because they involve the same underlying event, specifically, the death of Wayne Benjamin Bradley while he was incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison. (ECF No. 4, Notice of Related Case.) Upon review of both cases, the Court finds that these actions are related within the meaning of Loc
More

RELATED CASE ORDER

On June 14, 2019, Plaintiff Taryn Bradley-Aboyade filed a Notice of Related Case in which counsel indicates the above-entitled civil actions are related because they involve the same underlying event, specifically, the death of Wayne Benjamin Bradley while he was incarcerated at Mule Creek State Prison. (ECF No. 4, Notice of Related Case.)

Upon review of both cases, the Court finds that these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). Pursuant to Rule 123 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, two actions are related when they involve the same parties and are based on a same or similar claim; when they involve the same transaction, property, or event; or when they "involve similar questions of fact and the same question of law and their assignment to the same Judge . . . is likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort." L.R. 123(a). Further,

[i]f the Judge to whom the action with the lower or lowest number has been assigned determines that assignment of the actions to a single Judge is likely to effect a savings of judicial effort or other economies, that Judge is authorized to enter an order reassigning all higher numbered related actions to himself or herself.

L.R. 123(c).

Here, although the actions involve different parties, the two actions are indeed based on a single event. Additionally, while the claims differ, the Court finds there will likely be overlapping questions of fact and law. At a minimum, then, assignment to the same judge would "effect a substantial savings of judicial effort." L.R. 123(a).

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123, however, merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge, it does not consolidate the actions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated 2:19-cv-01098-MCE-CKD is reassigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire, and the caption shall read 2:19-cv-01098-TLN-AC. Any dates currently set in 2:19-cv-01098-MCE-CKD are hereby VACATED. The Clerk of the Court is to issue the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer