Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hunter Holdings, LLC v. Nashua Homes of Idaho, Inc., 3:16-cv-00664-MMD-WGC (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180305b36 Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING AND EXTEND DATES AND DEADLINES ON CHRISTY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC and ARGENTA RIM, LLC, by and through their attorneys of record, Robertson & Associates, LLP and Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP, and Defendants, CHRISTY CORPORATION, LTD and SCOTT A. CHRISTY, P.E. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "CHRISTY"), by and
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING AND EXTEND DATES AND DEADLINES ON CHRISTY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs, HUNTER HOLDINGS, LLC and ARGENTA RIM, LLC, by and through their attorneys of record, Robertson & Associates, LLP and Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP, and Defendants, CHRISTY CORPORATION, LTD and SCOTT A. CHRISTY, P.E. (hereinafter collectively referred to as "CHRISTY"), by and through their attorneys of record, RANDS, SOUTH & GARDNER, to continue the hearing and extend the dates and deadlines related to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter.

WHEREAS, on or about February 12, 2018, CHRISTY filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in this case (Document 60);

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs' Opposition to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment must currently be filed on or before March 5, 2018;

WHEREAS, CHRISTY's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment must currently be filed on or before March 19, 2018;

WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs and counsel for CHRISTY are currently discussing a possible settlement between the parties;

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs do not want to incur the time or expense in preparing an Opposition if they can settle the case with CHRISTY;

WHEREAS, CHRISTY is amenable to a reasonable postponement of the scheduling of the hearing on their Motion for Summary Judgment and continuances of the deadlines for the filing of Plaintiffs' Opposition and CHRISTY's Reply to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment; and

WHEREAS, a trial date has not yet been set in this case.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:

The deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued from March 5, 2018 to May 4, 2018;

The deadline for CHRISTY's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued from March 19, 2018 to May 18, 2018; and

The hearing on CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be scheduled for a date and time based on the Court' calendar.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing and dates and deadlines related to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-entitled matter shall be modified to reflect the following new dates and deadlines:

(1) The deadline for Plaintiffs' Opposition to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued from March 5, 2018 to May 4, 2018;

(2) The deadline for CHRISTY's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be continued from March 19, 2018 to May 18, 2018; and

(3) The hearing on CHRISTY's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be scheduled for _______________________________ at _______________ in Department __________ of the above-entitled Court.

ECF ATTESTATION

I, ALEXANDER ROBERTSON, IV, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE HEARING AND EXTEND DATES AND DEADLINES ON CHRISTY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. In accordance with Local Rule 5-4.3.4, concurrence in and authorization of the filing of this document has been obtained from Brett K. South, Esq., counsel for CHRISTY CORPORATION, LTD and SCOTT A. CHRISTY, P.E., and I shall maintain records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request by a party.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer