KELLER v. BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 3:13-cv-05915-TEH. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20141117732
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). [ PROPOSED ] ORDER The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause appearing, this ac
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge. STIPULATION IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). [ PROPOSED ] ORDER The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause appearing, this act..
More
STIPULATION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(A)(1) AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court having read and considered the foregoing request and stipulation, and with good cause appearing, this action is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
