Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

uiActive, Inc. v. Myriad Group, Ag., 3:16-cv-07349-SI. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170505a27 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 04, 2017
Latest Update: May 04, 2017
Summary: FINAL STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT BY PLAINTIFF [Conformed Signatures Permitted] SUSAN ILLSTON , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41, plaintiff, uiActive, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff"), and defendants, Myriad Group, AG, Stephen Dunford, and Erik Hansen (collectively hereinafter referred to as "Defendants"), acting by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses its Complaint (ECF N
More

FINAL STIPULATION TO DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT BY PLAINTIFF

[Conformed Signatures Permitted]

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41, plaintiff, uiActive, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Plaintiff"), and defendants, Myriad Group, AG, Stephen Dunford, and Erik Hansen (collectively hereinafter referred to as "Defendants"), acting by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses its Complaint (ECF No. 1) without any prejudice whatsoever, express or implied, in the above-entitled action.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to L. R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory thereto.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer