LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
Discovery activity in the above-entitled action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, and/or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for purposes other than prosecuting or defending this litigation is warranted. Such information is likely to include, among other things, private personnel information of employees/former employees and private medical information about non-parties. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order ("Order").
The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all documents, information, or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information and items that are entitled to treatment as confidential under applicable law.
This Order does not in any way impact the protections from discovery provided by the attorney-client privilege or the attorney work product doctrine or any other objection. This Order shall not enlarge, concede, abrogate or diminish any privilege, or any statutory or other legal obligation or right of any individual with respect to DISCOVERY MATERIALS, as defined herein.
The protections conferred by this Order cover PROTECTED MATERIALS and any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court, or in other settings that might reveal PROTECTED MATERIALS. However, the protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of PROTECTED MATERIALS at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order.
This Order shall remain in effect for the duration of the action and shall survive the final conclusion of this action unless terminated in a signed stipulation or pursuant to Court order, provided that once a party and its/her counsel have complied with Paragraph 6.8 after final resolution of the litigation, then this Order shall remain in effect only as to Paragraph 7.
Each party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A designating party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of materials, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the materials, documents, items, or oral or written communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
If it comes to a Designating Party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
(a) Plaintiff Elsy Garcia De Mira;
(b) the parties' counsel and in-house counsel, as well as their respective paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staffs;
(c) any current or former officers, directors, or employees of Defendants or Heartland Employment Services, LLC necessary to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, but only to non-supervisory, current or former employees who have signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A";
(d) any consultants or expert witnesses (including their staff) necessary or appropriate to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, provided they have signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A";
(e) the Court and its personnel either in camera or as filed under seal per Civil Local Rule 79-5;
(f) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and other vendors (e.g., persons or entities that provide litigation support services such as photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) necessary or appropriate to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, provided they have signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A";
(g) during their depositions, witnesses necessary to the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action, provided they have signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A" or are otherwise authorized by this Order to view CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION;
(h) any discovery referees, as well as any neutrals or mediators, retained for alternative dispute resolution purposes;
(i) the author or intended recipient of a document containing CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information in the document, provided he or she has signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A"; and
(j) as otherwise agreed by the parties in good faith, which agreement is confirmed in writing or on the record in court or deposition in advance of the disclosure.
(a) the parties' counsel and in-house counsel, as well as their respective paralegal, clerical and secretarial staffs;
(b) any current or former officers, directors, or management-level employees of Defendants and Heartland Employment Services, LLC necessary or appropriate to aid in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action;
(c) Plaintiff Elsy De Mira only (but not any unnamed class members) as necessary or appropriate to aid in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action, provided Plaintiff signs in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A" and is not permitted to maintain possession of such designated ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY items or information at any time;
(d) any expert witnesses and consultants (and their staff) necessary or appropriate to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, provided they have signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A";
(e) the Court and its personnel either in camera or as filed under seal Civil Local Rule 79-5;
(f) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and other vendors (e.g., persons or entities that provide litigation support services such as photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) necessary or appropriate to aid in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action, provided they have signed in advance of the disclosure the Nondisclosure Agreement attached hereto as "Attachment A";
(g) any discovery referees, as well as any neutrals or mediators, retained for alternative dispute resolution purposes;
(h) the author of a document containing ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY information; and
(i) as otherwise agreed by the parties in good faith, which agreement is confirmed in writing or on the record in deposition or in court in advance of the disclosure.
(a) Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality. Challenges to particular confidentiality designations must be initiated in writing within thirty (30) days of the challenging Party's receipt of DISCOVERY MATERIALS containing the challenged document or information. If more than thirty (30) days has lapsed since the challenging Party's receipt of DISCOVERY MATERIALS containing the designations being challenged, the challenging Party must provide reasonable justification for its delay in bringing the challenge.
(b) Any party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party's confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging party must explain the basis for her/its belief that the confidentiality designation is not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in the designation is offered, to explain the basis for the designation. A challenging party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only after it/she has engaged in this meet and confer process.
(c) Any party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the designating party may file and serve a motion, for good cause shown, under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and General Order 62, if applicable) within 21 days of the initial notice of challenge or within 14 days of the parties agreeing that the meet and confer process will not resolve their dispute, whichever is later. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the moving party has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party during the meet and confer process. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Until the Court rules on the challenge, the parties shall treat the challenged material as CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY, as applicable, under this Order.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I, Jennifer L. Connor, obtained concurrence from signatory in filing.
As a condition to inspecting or otherwise using documents and information produced in the action captioned Elsy Garcia de Mira v. HCR ManorCare, et al. (Case No. CV 12-04092 LHK), I certify that I have read the attached Protective Order ("Order") regarding the handling of documents and information designated as CONFIDENTIAL or ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY and hereby agree to make no use of such documents and/or information except as permitted by the Order, to make no disclosure of such documents and/or information to persons other than those who may have access thereto under such Order, to return all originals and all copies of such documents and/or information when required to do so under such Order, and otherwise to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the Order.