Acosta v. Alamari, 1:18-cv-00240-AWI-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180627807
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 9) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 6, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants Mohamad Alamari, aka Mohamed Alamari, and Monirah Alamari, both individually and dba Discount Market, filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 9.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of
Summary: ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE (ECF No. 9) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On June 6, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants Mohamad Alamari, aka Mohamed Alamari, and Monirah Alamari, both individually and dba Discount Market, filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 9.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of S..
More
ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
(ECF No. 9)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
On June 6, 2018, Plaintiff Jose Acosta and Defendants Mohamad Alamari, aka Mohamed Alamari, and Monirah Alamari, both individually and dba Discount Market, filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 9.) In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
