Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marshall v. Gastelo, 2:18-cv-00648-MWF (SHK). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190802762 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge, which corrects a clerical error in the original Report and Recommendation, on page 6. The Court has eng
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge, which corrects a clerical error in the original Report and Recommendation, on page 6. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) DENYING the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) DISMISSING this action with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer